George Gollin's Lies Exposed Again

[ham]

No, it's not a rehash of any number of old threads. It's George Gollin (George D. Gollin, George Dana Gollin) getting caught in yet another lie.

Remember that little federal extortion and slander lawsuit against George Gollin, the one that was dismissed by the court on its own motion for lack of jurisdiction?

George Gollin falsely asserted that the plaintiffs were ordered to pay $58,000 in sanctions.

$58k
by g-gollin on Tue Aug 17, 2010 11:36 am

Just to put an endcap on this thread: case dismissed, plaintiff and his lawyer at each others' throats, Illinois defendants file for $58k in Rule 11 sanctions against them, and Mr. Meatloaf is still clowning it up at 2 am when he can't find a Gilligan's Island rerun.

Send us the money
by g-gollin on Thu Sep 16, 2010 2:31 am

g-gollin wrote:Just to put an endcap on this thread: case dismissed, plaintiff and his lawyer at each others' throats, Illinois defendants file for $58k in Rule 11 sanctions against them, and Mr. Meatloaf is still clowning it up at 2 am when he can't find a Gilligan's Island rerun.

The judge just ordered the YahooPlainDucks to pay money to the University of Illinois for having done the things they've done. Eat a grapefruit, Redlyne Doodlebag.

In fact, the defendants' frivolous sanction motion was denied by the court on September 14, 2010. Notice the word DENIED in big red letters at the top of the document.

Defendants recovered NOTHING on that motion, and, more specifically, they recovered NONE of the tens of thousands of dollars in attorney fees that the Illinois taxpayers were forced to incur defending George Gollin's dissolute conduct as alleged in the complaint.

Defendants were awarded only their routine"costs" which include only such things as filing fees, postage and similar minor administrative expenses. On September 24, 2010 the defendants submitted a costs bill for only $1,107.47. Only off by ~500%; not bad for someone who needed 15 other people to write his dissertation for him.

So once again, we must conclude either (a) George Gollin is a complete idiot and has no clue what is going on, or (b) George Gollin knows exactly what is going on but because he thinks you don't he chooses to lie about it instead.

Why is this so easy? Every time anybody takes ten minutes to verify George Gollin's outlandish claims the result is that George Gollin is exposed as a liar and a fraud. Is this his new defense strategy against future defamation actions--that since nobody could possibly take anything he says seriously he isn't damaging anyone with his lies?

Let the backpedalling begin (and the baby talk and bathroom metaphor continue).

Oh, come on!
Stop picking on him for this trifle...
He hasn't claimed to have butchered 600 Japanese all by himself and that racists denied him his gold medal...at least not yet...