04-09-2009, 05:20 PM
Comrade Obama bends over for Sodomy Arabian King Abdullah:
![[Image: obamas420-420x0.jpg]](http://images.smh.com.au/2009/04/03/448351/obamas420-420x0.jpg)
Where is Winston Churchill when you need him?
Winston Churchill, "The River War: An Account of the Reconquest of Sudan" (Vol 2, pages 248-250)
http://www.islam-watch.org/AdrianMorgan/...lamism.htm
Quote:Did Obama bow to Saudi king? See video
White House aide speaking anonymously: ‘It wasn’t a bow ... he’s taller than King Abdullah’
April 8, 2009
BY MATTHEW NICKERSON | STAFF REPORTER
A photo of President Obama apparently bowing in front of King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia is stirring a royal-size controversy.
The photo and a video were largely ignored by mainstream media outlets but created outrage in some quarters.
“Such an act is a traditional obeisance befitting a king's subjects, not his peer. There is no precedent for U.S. presidents bowing to Saudi or any other royals,” said the conservative Washington Times.
An Obama aide speaking anonymously denied that the president was bowing.
“It wasn’t a bow. He grasped his hand with two hands, and he’s taller than King Abdullah,” the aide was quoted as saying by Politco.com Wednesday.
That explanation was “absurd,” the conservative Weekly Standard said. And the caption attached to the Getty Images photo said the president was bowing.
The setting was world leaders mingling before their official photo at the G-20 economic summit in London on April 1.
The heads of state were being photographed with Queen Elizabeth II — to whom Obama did not bow, online commenters said.
Some on the Hot Air Web site had fun with the whole affair, offering:
— “That is how they do it in Chicago . . .”
— “He wasn’t bowing . . . he was ducking in case someone threw a shoe.”
Where is Winston Churchill when you need him?
Quote:How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property - either as a child, a wife, or a concubine - must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men.
Individual Moslems may show splendid qualities. Thousands become the brave and loyal soldiers of the Queen: all know how to die. But the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science - the science against which it had vainly struggled - the civilization of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilization of ancient Rome.
Winston Churchill, "The River War: An Account of the Reconquest of Sudan" (Vol 2, pages 248-250)
http://www.islam-watch.org/AdrianMorgan/...lamism.htm