Anonymous Vows Retaliation for Dog Killing
#1
Reply
#2
I knew that driving while black is a capital crime, I just didn't realize that walking your dog while black rated killing it. I didn't realize there were still such piece-of-shit scumbag pricks left as these policemen. Make an illegal arrest and then shoot the guys dog. I hope he just won the million dollar lottery and good luck Anonymous.
Reply
#3
Reply
#4
The pricks still made the same arrest for being black in public. And they did nothing to defuse the situation making motions toward the dog encouraging it to snap and then shooting it. Nope - nothing changed. Still the same assholes. How hard would it be to give the guy a minute to secure his dog, considering the arrest was bullshit and the guy was cooperative.
Reply
#5
In Illinois it is illegal to tape a police officer. Well you can tape but not record. There is a case pending before the federal court to determine if it is constitutional.

It should be mentioned that in Cook County, the Sheriff's Deputies are notorious for using force and even killing witnesses. They are so bad that even the Chicago PD hates them.
"None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free."

Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
Reply
#6
(07-12-2013, 05:45 PM)Virtual Bison Wrote: In Illinois it is illegal to tape a police officer. Well you can tape but not record. There is a case pending before the federal court to determine if it is constitutional.

Several states have similar laws, but taping/recording public statements (where there is no expectation of privacy) is permitted. Always that darn Constitution getting in the way of government oppression! Recording private conversations (i.e., eavesdropping) is, of course, prohibited for the same reason.
Reply
#7
(07-13-2013, 03:27 AM)Albert Hidel Wrote: Several states have similar laws, but taping/recording public statements (where there is no expectation of privacy) is permitted. Always that darn Constitution getting in the way of government oppression! Recording private conversations (i.e., eavesdropping) is, of course, prohibited for the same reason.

It really is unconstitutional to forbid taping of police action since this is a public activity which will lead to the arrest or conviction of someone. But apperantly the constitution does not apply in such cases.

Its never a problem for the cops to infringe on our rights but their rights are somehow more meaningful.
"None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free."

Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Defamatory anonymous blogs under fire sympa 5 27,016 09-12-2009, 07:55 PM
Last Post: ham

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)