Careful What You Say

[Brian Crawford]

US Secret Service Agents are also very unhappy with George Gollin (George Dana Gollin, George D. Gollin) although 80% of his information was correct, that pesky annoying  20% that he was wrong on during the SRU investigation pisses them off.

I've heard similar things, except the percentage of "wrong" info is believed to be quite a bit higher.

Gollin's future value as an "informant" is considered nill by responsible law enforcement.  Gollin's dirty laundry is so well publicized now that nobody who has ever run a google search on him takes him seriously.  No prosecutor wants to have to explain why his eagle eye witness didn't know about his own gay boy porn connection, ignored his wife's mutant pork vending, overlooked his colleagues sodomizing student mass murderers, his "collaborative" dissertation, his G-Man impersonations, etc. etc. etc.

And the fact is that many people were making the same negative comments about CCU and Nova in their early stages as were beiing made about SRU.  Given the time to get their act together and accumulate a sufficient war chest, they eventually became accredited and now are considered respectable if not spectacular schools.  SRU never got the chance because our own government arranged to pull the Liberian accreditation rug out from under them.  

Gollin is more akin to an abortionist than a savior.  He killed the baby in the womb before it had a chance to form.  Too small, can't breath, I did the world a favor he says.  

Gollin is just a shill for the wealthy cartel that controls higher education.  The only interests he protects are the billion dollar endowments who have ample resources to protect themselves.  

True, the percentage may be more like 60% right than 80%. I was being kind to George Gollin (George Dana Gollin, George D. Gollin) and giving him more credit than I should have.