01-13-2008, 12:02 PM
(This post was last modified: 01-13-2008, 12:08 PM by Randall Flagg.)
I just did a search of George Gollin and you know what? he is the one posting almost all the stuff about George Gollin. It's I-I-I-I-I-I, over and over.
Look at all the stuff he tries to take credit for.
http://www.hep.uiuc.edu/home/g-gollin/hi...tion.html
You just have to wonder. If they have to talk about themselves all the time, just how important can they be? I mean, wouldn't some of these government agencies be thanking him publicly. Wouldn't we see awards being given out. Where are the pictures of the President and Gollin, Governors and Gollin, Mayors and Gollin, hell, at least a police chief and Gollin. Maybe a deputy assistant to the chief assistant to some mayor, somebody at least, but it's all "I did this" and "I did that", but not any, he did this and he did that. Except, when George pretends to be someone else, and he then touts himself.
It's a bunch of self-serving garbage. One can only wonder what would be said if the attorney general of Washington was contacted and asked just what George's roll was. Was he the main source of the investigation and information gathered as he tries to say, or, is he greatly hyping his part? And all the other things he is trying to take credit for, as did/does Bear, would the authorities support these claims or as would most likely happen, just say--Nothing.
I just don't see all these people giving credit to Gollin. I see him giving most of the credit to Gollin, there is a difference here, I believe.
Look at all the stuff he tries to take credit for.
http://www.hep.uiuc.edu/home/g-gollin/hi...tion.html
You just have to wonder. If they have to talk about themselves all the time, just how important can they be? I mean, wouldn't some of these government agencies be thanking him publicly. Wouldn't we see awards being given out. Where are the pictures of the President and Gollin, Governors and Gollin, Mayors and Gollin, hell, at least a police chief and Gollin. Maybe a deputy assistant to the chief assistant to some mayor, somebody at least, but it's all "I did this" and "I did that", but not any, he did this and he did that. Except, when George pretends to be someone else, and he then touts himself.
It's a bunch of self-serving garbage. One can only wonder what would be said if the attorney general of Washington was contacted and asked just what George's roll was. Was he the main source of the investigation and information gathered as he tries to say, or, is he greatly hyping his part? And all the other things he is trying to take credit for, as did/does Bear, would the authorities support these claims or as would most likely happen, just say--Nothing.
I just don't see all these people giving credit to Gollin. I see him giving most of the credit to Gollin, there is a difference here, I believe.
James
A.S., B.S., M.B.A.
A.S., B.S., M.B.A.