+- DL Truth: Distance Learning Truth (https://www.dltruth.com)
+-- Forum: DL Hall of Shame: Individuals (https://www.dltruth.com/forum-7.html)
+--- Forum: Nominees, second-stringers, others (https://www.dltruth.com/forum-16.html)
+--- Thread: Doogle @ Homeland Security (/thread-495.html)
RE: Doogle @ Homeland Security - BROWN TEAL - 06-30-2010
dooglearse Wrote:Geoff?Vankirk Wrote:Douglas will criticize your accomplishments and criticize your school but he has no problem embracing the PhD by publication process or thesis-only PhD programs. I fail to see the difference but maybe RCD would like to explain it to us?
You've already done it. The schools in question are fake. The processes followed are not standard. The work produced is not a doctoral thesis. Ph.D. by publication is not the awarding of a doctorate for writing a book--it is about awarding a doctorate for other scholarly work, combined with a binding document. None of this was followed, and the awarding schools are completely fake. Exactly what is it--besides a nice book, which isn't under scrutiny--that is being defended?
Totally wrong again RCD, the KU degree was based on over 400,000 words (Published works), not only on Pateke, but on wetlands and the environment, and was assessed by one of Europe's most distinguished professors in Zoology and by one of the USA's leading Zoo Profs.
But you do know (but choose to ignore) that KU was a highly successful private university that operated perfectly legally in Denmark.
RE: Doogle @ Homeland Security - dooglearse - 06-30-2010
BROWN?TEAL Wrote:Totally wrong again RCD, the KU degree was based on over 400,000 words (Published works), not only on Pateke, but on wetlands and the environment, and was assessed by one of Europe's most distinguished professors in Zoology and by one of the USA's leading Zoo Profs.
But you do know (but choose to ignore) that KU was a highly successful private university that operated perfectly legally in Denmark.
That's not entirely true. First you shopped your work to a diploma mill in the U.S., accepting their "Ph.D." Then you shopped it to "Knightsbridge," which did the same. But you did not publish a thesis based on the work--they "awarded" the "degree" based on what you'd already written. Finally, "Knightsbridge" was a totally fake operation that had no recognition as a university anywhere in the world for as long as it operated (and wherever it operated!). Terms like "highly successful" and "perfectly legal" are dodges. The first is without context or standard and the second is not relevant to whether or not the university was recognized. It was not.
Zoology? Didn't Knightsbridge award your degree in another area (after you first applied for a different degree)? Are you seriously expecting people who know about such things to accept the legitimacy of a degree (a) awarded by an unrecognized "university" run out of some guy's house without any recognition in its home country or anywhere else around the world, and (b) based on previously compiled work without any effort to form it into a thesis, and c) without a shred of scholarly (not trade) publication included, and (d) in a different area than the sole supervisor's area of expertise? Really?
Again, I have no interest in judging your work. I can accept it as serious and worthwhile at face value, yet still demonstrate that the process used and the institution in which is occurred--and which awarded the unrecognized degree--was a sham.
RE: Doogle @ Homeland Security - ham - 06-30-2010
Quote:Not really sure where you are coming from, so I'll ignore it.
I just came from the toilet...and you?
Quote:It is as available as any other doctoral dissertation.
as I said, whatever floats your boat.
I see that you seem to be a fine logician...did Achilles beat the turtle, then?
RE: Doogle @ Homeland Security - BROWN TEAL - 06-30-2010
dooglearse Wrote:That's not entirely true. First you shopped your work to a diploma mill in the U.S., accepting their "Ph.D." Then you shopped it to "Knightsbridge," which did the same. But you did not publish a thesis based on the work--they "awarded" the "degree" based on what you'd already written. Finally, "Knightsbridge" was a totally fake operation that had no recognition as a university anywhere in the world for as long as it operated (and wherever it operated!). Terms like "highly successful" and "perfectly legal" are dodges. The first is without context or standard and the second is not relevant to whether or not the university was recognized. It was not.
Zoology? Didn't Knightsbridge award your degree in another area (after you first applied for a different degree)? Are you seriously expecting people who know about such things to accept the legitimacy of a degree (a) awarded by an unrecognized "university" run out of some guy's house without any recognition in its home country or anywhere else around the world, and (b) based on previously compiled work without any effort to form it into a thesis, and c) without a shred of scholarly (not trade) publication included, and (d) in a different area than the sole supervisor's area of expertise? Really?
Again, I have no interest in judging your work. I can accept it as serious and worthwhile at face value, yet still demonstrate that the process used and the institution in which is occurred--and which awarded the unrecognized degree--was a sham.
It sure is sad to read such a lot of garbage; garbage that is so devoid of facts that what you recite is nothing short of outrageous lies and shows that you really know little about anything. But there again, your life has always revolved totally around lies and bullshit. All very reminiscent of Walter Mitty!
RE: Doogle @ Homeland Security - dooglearse - 06-30-2010
BROWN TEAL Wrote:It sure is sad to read such a lot of garbage; garbage that is so devoid of facts that what you recite is nothing short of outrageous lies and shows that you really know little about anything. But there again, your life has always revolved totally around lies and bullshit. All very reminiscent of Walter Mitty!
As you learn discourse, I would recommend discovering the difference between "assessments" and "assertions."
Let's keep it simple. I assert that you have obtained two doctorates, one from Trinity and one from Knightsbridge. I'll leave the assessments to others.
RE: Doogle @ Homeland Security - RespectableGent - 07-09-2010
dooglearse Wrote:That's not entirely true. First you shopped your work to a diploma mill in the U.S., accepting their "Ph.D." Then you shopped it to "Knightsbridge," which did the same. But you did not publish a thesis based on the work--they "awarded" the "degree" based on what you'd already written. Finally, "Knightsbridge" was a totally fake operation that had no recognition as a university anywhere in the world for as long as it operated (and wherever it operated!). Terms like "highly successful" and "perfectly legal" are dodges. The first is without context or standard and the second is not relevant to whether or not the university was recognized. It was not.
Zoology? Didn't Knightsbridge award your degree in another area (after you first applied for a different degree)? Are you seriously expecting people who know about such things to accept the legitimacy of a degree (a) awarded by an unrecognized "university" run out of some guy's house without any recognition in its home country or anywhere else around the world, and (b) based on previously compiled work without any effort to form it into a thesis, and c) without a shred of scholarly (not trade) publication included, and (d) in a different area than the sole supervisor's area of expertise? Really?
Again, I have no interest in judging your work. I can accept it as serious and worthwhile at face value, yet still demonstrate that the process used and the institution in which is occurred--and which awarded the unrecognized degree--was a sham.
What do you care what Knightsbridge does with its students?
The State of New Jersey and the Easy Three commit far more heinous crimes against academia every single day.
RE: Doogle @ Homeland Security - BROWN TEAL - 07-09-2010
dooglearse Wrote:As you learn discourse, I would recommend discovering the difference between "assessments" and "assertions."
Let's keep it simple. I assert that you have obtained two doctorates, one from Trinity and one from Knightsbridge. I'll leave the assessments to others.
Have you ever considered why it is that you and your two mates are the only people of earth who have problems with my KU degree?
I think you really need to determine why this is - and at the same time consider why the majority who have noted how easily you obtained your four degrees (or was it 5 or 6?) believe that all your 'degrees' came from degree mills.
RE: Doogle @ Homeland Security - dooglearse - 07-09-2010
BROWN TEAL Wrote:Have you ever considered why it is that you and your two mates are the only people of earth who have problems with my KU degree?
I don't know which two "mates" you're referring to, but every time you're confronted with the facts about it, you complain about (a) the poster and (b) being pressed by it. But I notice you never correct the record, because it is very much correct already.
Quote:I think you really need to determine why this is - and at the same time consider why the majority who have noted how easily you obtained your four degrees (or was it 5 or 6?) believe that all your 'degrees' came from degree mills.
Your advice in this matter is worthless. My degrees come from:
Community College of the Air Force (accredited by SACS)
The University of the State of New York (accredited by Middle States)
National University (accredited by WASC)
Union Institute and University (accredited by NCA)
The two doctorates you've claimed come from:
Trinity College and University (never accredited, no longer operating in the U.S. Never recognized by any authoritative body as a university, despite operating from multiple addresses.)
Knightsbridge University (never accredited, operated from a man's house--a man without the academic credentials to do so, even. Operated from a series of addresses, purporting to be a British school--it was not--until settling in Denmark--where it was not recognized by Danish authorities, or any other, as a university.)
The facts above are not in dispute. What they mean is, but really, only by you.
RE: Doogle @ Homeland Security - BROWN TEAL - 08-02-2010
dooglearse Wrote:Your advice in this matter is worthless. My degrees come from:
Community College of the Air Force (accredited by SACS)
The University of the State of New York (accredited by Middle States)
National University (accredited by WASC)
Union Institute and University (accredited by NCA)
The two doctorates you've claimed come from:
Trinity College and University (never accredited, no longer operating in the U.S. Never recognized by any authoritative body as a university, despite operating from multiple addresses.)
Knightsbridge University (never accredited, operated from a man's house--a man without the academic credentials to do so, even. Operated from a series of addresses, purporting to be a British school--it was not--until settling in Denmark--where it was not recognized by Danish authorities, or any other, as a university.)
The facts above are not in dispute. What they mean is, but really, only by you.
Sad that Dooglearse doesn't post here any more as he helped brighten up the place somewhat - although his friend Ham has taken his place quite successfully, but does not have the 'class' of the Air Vice Marshal!