+- DL Truth: Distance Learning Truth (https://www.dltruth.com)
+-- Forum: DL Hall of Shame: Individuals (https://www.dltruth.com/forum-7.html)
+--- Forum: Nominees, second-stringers, others (https://www.dltruth.com/forum-16.html)
+--- Thread: Doogle @ Homeland Security (/thread-495.html)
RE: Doogle @ Homeland Security - ham - 06-28-2010
I suggest the thesis be made public, if you want someone to read it beyond the same old faces.
RE: Doogle @ Homeland Security - BROWN TEAL - 06-28-2010
Quote: Which would violate the copyright, "doctor." But I would expect no less from someone with two (two!) fake doctorates stemming from the same unsupervised treatment. It is available for a slightly higher cost, and likely more quickly, from Proquest. Oh, and legally, too.
Afraid your knowledge of copyrighted educational material is somewhat flawed. I purchased my copy direct from the Union Library! Did the library violate any copyright?
RE: Doogle @ Homeland Security - dooglearse - 06-28-2010
Which would violate the copyright, "doctor." But I would expect no less from someone with two (two!) fake doctorates stemming from the same unsupervised treatment. It is available for a slightly higher cost, and likely more quickly, from Proquest. Oh, and legally, too.
Quote:Afraid your knowledge of copyrighted educational material is somewhat flawed. I purchased my copy direct from the Union Library! Did the library violate any copyright?
No, but if you distribute it, you will. I don't care, because I don't care what you do. You don't care because you lack a moral compass. Hence the two fake doctorates.
RE: Doogle @ Homeland Security - dooglearse - 06-28-2010
ham Wrote:I suggest the thesis be made public, if you want someone to read it beyond the same old faces.
It is "public." It can be purchased from Proquest, but in paper only to discourage the kind of thing Dr. Duck is talking about doing. And I don't care if anyone reads it, irrespective of how they might obtain it.
RE: Doogle @ Homeland Security - dooglearse - 06-28-2010
Dennis?Ruhl Wrote:My Little Book of ...? It escapes me at the moment.
Hmmm....so does the title of your doctoral thesis.
RE: Doogle @ Homeland Security - BROWN TEAL - 06-28-2010
dooglearse Wrote:No, but if you distribute it, you will. I don't care, because I don't care what you do. You don't care because you lack a moral compass. Hence the two fake doctorates.
Well, that is quite a contradiction isn't it? It sure is!
RE: Doogle @ Homeland Security - ham - 06-28-2010
dooglearse Wrote:ham Wrote:I suggest the thesis be made public, if you want someone to read it beyond the same old faces.
It is "public." It can be purchased from Proquest, but in paper only to discourage the kind of thing Dr. Duck is talking about doing. And I don't care if anyone reads it, irrespective of how they might obtain it.
Have you anything to fear?
If not, let it be public.
Frankly, Ham can't afford spending €60 (what his local university charges to do this) because he needs medications, too...QTJ told him he's gonna share which plan he uses...
RE: Doogle @ Homeland Security - BROWN TEAL - 06-29-2010
BROWN TEAL Wrote:Afraid your knowledge of copyrighted educational material is somewhat flawed. I purchased my copy direct from the Union Library! Did the library violate any copyright?
Why the Squadron Leader has always attempted to hide his PhD dissertation I've never figured out as it makes interesting, but long-winded, reading. The most important result in his revelations is that unaccredited degrees have close to the same validity as accredited degrees.
RE: Doogle @ Homeland Security - dooglearse - 06-29-2010
ham Wrote:Have you anything to fear?
If not, let it be public.
Frankly, Ham can't afford spending €60 (what his local university charges to do this) because he needs medications, too...QTJ told him he's gonna share which plan he uses...
Again, it is "public." That it is not "free" is another matter.
RE: Doogle @ Homeland Security - dooglearse - 06-29-2010
BROWN TEAL Wrote:Why the Squadron Leader has always attempted to hide his PhD dissertation I've never figured out as it makes interesting, but long-winded, reading. The most important result in his revelations is that unaccredited degrees have close to the same validity as accredited degrees.
This is a lie, but it befits the fake scholar who imparts it.
It is not "hidden"--it is available to anyone.
It is not "long-winded"--at 175 pages (inclusive), it is rather normal.
Dr. Duck mis-states the one conclusion he cites, of course.
Neal, perhaps you can do some supervised research and earn a real, recognized degree before you criticize the work of others--work you have not yet undertaken yourself?