Posts: 113
Threads: 2
Joined: Jun 2010
rockon Wrote:"Dr" Duck and "Dr" Doogle, what exactly are you trying to prove and to whom by this endless silly exchange?
"Dr" Duck, everyone knows you've done some worthwhile research on that bird for which you have received international recognition. Everyone also knows that you possess a couple of totally worthless doctorates. So, no matter how hard you try, you'll never convince anyone you are a real doctor.
"Dr" Doogle, everyone knows how you got your "doctorate" from that bottom tier school. So, no matter how hard you try, you'll never convince anyone you are a real scholar. I can hear you saying, "but my degree is RA". Well, that wouldn't make any difference in academic circles or to people who know anything about real Ph.D. degrees. All you did to get your "Ph.D." was a survey of the acceptance of accredited and unaccredited degrees by employers. That's hardly the standard of accepted Ph.D. research work. What will be next, a Ph.D. in biscuit cutting?
Give it up guys, you can't convince anyone here. You can't convince yourselves either. You can use your "doctorates" to impress your neighbors and your friends and relatives who cannot tell the difference between Knightbridge and Harvard, or between a real Ph.D. research and a survey.
Whilst I agree with some of what you have written you forget that it was John Bear and his cohorts who, for many years, preached the virtue of so-called ‘unaccredited’ degrees, and that there are over 5,000 legitimate private universities in the world that have no direct bureaucratic oversight. In fact the very word ‘accredited’ is a word rarely used outside the USA – where massive anomalies occur in the quality of ‘accredited degrees’, because of the varying standards between accrediting agencies. This is why it was very easy for the Air Vice Marshal to rapidly obtain a ‘Doctorate’ from Union, and why his mates at DD obtained very easy, very dubious and quite meaningless ‘degrees, from low level universities.
One day I will reveal how valuable my KU degree has been to me, but I know full well that if I did this the Air Vice Marshal and his mates would soon be pounding their chests and spreading venom all over the countryside – in their well known manner. But as I said before, the KU degree is just one of my many qualifications.
Posts: 66
Threads: 0
Joined: Jun 2010
rockon Wrote:"Dr" Duck and "Dr" Doogle, what exactly are you trying to prove and to whom by this endless silly exchange?
"Dr" Duck, everyone knows you've done some worthwhile research on that bird for which you have received international recognition. Everyone also knows that you possess a couple of totally worthless doctorates. So, no matter how hard you try, you'll never convince anyone you are a real doctor.
"Dr" Doogle, everyone knows how you got your "doctorate" from that bottom tier school. So, no matter how hard you try, you'll never convince anyone you are a real scholar. I can hear you saying, "but my degree is RA". Well, that wouldn't make any difference in academic circles or to people who know anything about real Ph.D. degrees. All you did to get your "Ph.D." was a survey of the acceptance of accredited and unaccredited degrees by employers. That's hardly the standard of accepted Ph.D. research work. What will be next, a Ph.D. in biscuit cutting?
Give it up guys, you can't convince anyone here. You can't convince yourselves either. You can use your "doctorates" to impress your neighbors and your friends and relatives who cannot tell the difference between Knightbridge and Harvard, or between a real Ph.D. research and a survey.
I'm not trying to convince anyone about my Ph.D. As for your "critique" of my research, you're entitled to your opinion.
Posts: 66
Threads: 0
Joined: Jun 2010
BROWN TEAL Wrote:Whilst I agree with some of what you have written you forget that it was John Bear and his cohorts who, for many years, preached the virtue of so-called ‘unaccredited’ degrees, and that there are over 5,000 legitimate private universities in the world that have no direct bureaucratic oversight. In fact the very word ‘accredited’ is a word rarely used outside the USA – where massive anomalies occur in the quality of ‘accredited degrees’, because of the varying standards between accrediting agencies. This is why it was very easy for the Air Vice Marshal to rapidly obtain a ‘Doctorate’ from Union, and why his mates at DD obtained very easy, very dubious and quite meaningless ‘degrees, from low level universities.
One day I will reveal how valuable my KU degree has been to me, but I know full well that if I did this the Air Vice Marshal and his mates would soon be pounding their chests and spreading venom all over the countryside – in their well known manner. But as I said before, the KU degree is just one of my many qualifications.
Seven years is not "rapid."
You're doctorates are not "unaccredited." They're fake. Remember how you had Knightsbridge change it from Zoology to Environmental management? (Don't deny it; we know because you told us.) Gee, I wonder why? Oh, yeah....
(We all know about how you used the fake degree to work your land deal.)
Posts: 113
Threads: 2
Joined: Jun 2010
dooglearse Wrote:Seven years is not "rapid."
You're doctorates are not "unaccredited." They're fake. Remember how you had Knightsbridge change it from Zoology to Environmental management? (Don't deny it; we know because you told us.) Gee, I wonder why? Oh, yeah....
(We all know about how you used the fake degree to work your land deal.)
Yet again RCD you are away with the fairies! The degree in Environmental Management was the one I applied for - accompanied by 1/2 million+ published words - and neither assessor (one in the USA and the other in Germany) was in a position to determine the degree awarded.
And as for your last comment it simply confirms what a real idiot you are, particularly as I've no idea what you are talking about.
Posts: 66
Threads: 0
Joined: Jun 2010
BROWN TEAL Wrote:Yet again RCD you are away with the fairies! The degree in Environmental Management was the one I applied for - accompanied by 1/2 million+ published words - and neither assessor (one in the USA and the other in Germany) was in a position to determine the degree awarded.
And as for your last comment it simply confirms what a real idiot you are, particularly as I've no idea what you are talking about.
Your statements, not mine.
Posts: 113
Threads: 2
Joined: Jun 2010
dooglearse Wrote:BROWN TEAL Wrote:Yet again RCD you are away with the fairies! The degree in Environmental Management was the one I applied for - accompanied by 1/2 million+ published words - and neither assessor (one in the USA and the other in Germany) was in a position to determine the degree awarded.
And as for your last comment it simply confirms what a real idiot you are, particularly as I've no idea what you are talking about. Your statements, not mine.
Unless you are prepared to say something intelligent I think the time is long overdue for you to return to your mates - where I'm sure you feel quite at home.
Posts: 66
Threads: 0
Joined: Jun 2010
"I think I'll enrol with Knightsbridge and see if I can become a double Dr Duck." August, 2003.
”I'm sure that my friends at CollegeHints will be pleased to know that I have just received word from Knightsbridge University that I have earned, and been awarded (subject to ratification by the KU Executive Council), a KU PhD in Environmental Management, under the KU 'PhD by Published Work' programme.” January, 2004
"I can mention that the assessment of my application, which took two months, was carried out by a Professor of Zoology at a German State University - a highly respected individual and KU Faculty member.” January, 2004
Recommendation by your "assessor" for your Knightsbridge degree (posted by you): "’In summary, all the presented documents and my literature search, indicate that Mr Hayes has a deep involvement in the study subject coupled with enthusiasm and readiness to invest substantial effort, an ability to combine basic and applied research studies, an ability to observe and synthesize material, knowledge of relavent literature, and a talent for writing. In my mind Mr Hayes is ready and equipped to defend his thesis and qualified to be granted the PhD in Zoology by Published Work’"
More you: "The PhD in Zoo being a considerable upgrade to my original application. Whilst I have never used my TCU PhD I have no reservation whatsoever about using the KU PhD - anywhere, anytime."
__________________
So, it started out as a degree in zoology, then was changed to Environmental Sciences. It was "assessed" by a zoologist, however, not an environmental scientist. So which degree did you actually receive? And I love the fact that you submitted your work to two institutions and got degrees from both for the same work.
I believe TC&U was operating in the U.S. at the time you bought your degree from them. They no longer do. That's why they're "out of business." The fact that they still run a mill from other countries doesn't change that. And where's Knightsbridge--who awarded the degree you would use "anywhere, anytime"? Oh, gone. Why? Did Fryst sell his house?
Your words.
Posts: 113
Threads: 2
Joined: Jun 2010
dooglearse Wrote:"I think I'll enrol with Knightsbridge and see if I can become a double Dr Duck." August, 2003.
”I'm sure that my friends at CollegeHints will be pleased to know that I have just received word from Knightsbridge University that I have earned, and been awarded (subject to ratification by the KU Executive Council), a KU PhD in Environmental Management, under the KU 'PhD by Published Work' programme.” January, 2004
"I can mention that the assessment of my application, which took two months, was carried out by a Professor of Zoology at a German State University - a highly respected individual and KU Faculty member.” January, 2004
Recommendation by your "assessor" for your Knightsbridge degree (posted by you): "’In summary, all the presented documents and my literature search, indicate that Mr Hayes has a deep involvement in the study subject coupled with enthusiasm and readiness to invest substantial effort, an ability to combine basic and applied research studies, an ability to observe and synthesize material, knowledge of relavent literature, and a talent for writing. In my mind Mr Hayes is ready and equipped to defend his thesis and qualified to be granted the PhD in Zoology by Published Work’"
More you: "The PhD in Zoo being a considerable upgrade to my original application. Whilst I have never used my TCU PhD I have no reservation whatsoever about using the KU PhD - anywhere, anytime."
__________________
So, it started out as a degree in zoology, then was changed to Environmental Sciences. It was "assessed" by a zoologist, however, not an environmental scientist. So which degree did you actually receive? And I love the fact that you submitted your work to two institutions and got degrees from both for the same work.
I believe TC&U was operating in the U.S. at the time you bought your degree from them. They no longer do. That's why they're "out of business." The fact that they still run a mill from other countries doesn't change that. And where's Knightsbridge--who awarded the degree you would use "anywhere, anytime"? Oh, gone. Why? Did Fryst sell his house? Your words.
Totally wrong on just about all your naive statements RCD. The degree is in Environmental Management; not that you would know what that is - or have any appreciation of the environment or of anything of value to humanity. You obviously spend your boring existence - stalking, sitting at your computer writing inane posts to numerous Internet discussion groups - five of which you helped destroy - ridiculing all who do not support your RA or NO WAY fanaticism, and in summary - you have been a continual embarrassment to civilisation and to education.
Posts: 5
Threads: 0
Joined: Apr 2010
07-08-2010, 08:23 PM
(This post was last modified: 07-08-2010, 08:24 PM by rockon.)
Hey guys, this is page six of this silliness! Enough!
Let's call it a draw.
Dr Duck has done real scholarly research, but has no real doctorate.
Dr Doogle has a real doctorate, but has done no real scholarly research.
Those are the facts, why don't you just accept it, let go and relax.
BTW Dr Doogle, my critique is not aimed at the quality of your survey - which I believe is really good - and I don't doubt your ability to do scholarly research, It is just unacceptable, and I can assure you many people would agree with me, that Ph.D.'s should be awarded on the basis of this type of survey.
Mr Duck, I believe no one, including Dr Doogle, doubts that you could have obtained a real Ph.D. from a real university, but you didn't. It was your choice, it's no use blaming Bear for your choice. You don't just dive head first into the deep because someone told you it's OK to do it, you check first. And, I tend to agree here with Doogle. It'd be different if you had a degree from one of the then unaccredited schools, such as CCU etc. or even schools such as Columbia Pacific when it still had full institutional approval. Knightsbridge and Trinity C&U were not just unaccredited, they were scams.
Posts: 113
Threads: 2
Joined: Jun 2010
rockon Wrote:Hey guys, this is page six of this silliness! Enough!
Let's call it a draw.
Dr Duck has done real scholarly research, but has no real doctorate.
Dr Doogle has a real doctorate, but has done no real scholarly research.
Those are the facts, why don't you just accept it, let go and relax.
BTW Dr Doogle, my critique is not aimed at the quality of your survey - which I believe is really good - and I don't doubt your ability to do scholarly research, It is just unacceptable, and I can assure you many people would agree with me, that Ph.D.'s should be awarded on the basis of this type of survey.
Mr Duck, I believe no one, including Dr Doogle, doubts that you could have obtained a real Ph.D. from a real university, but you didn't. It was your choice, it's no use blaming Bear for your choice. You don't just dive head first into the deep because someone told you it's OK to do it, you check first. And, I tend to agree here with Doogle. It'd be different if you had a degree from one of the then unaccredited schools, such as CCU etc. or even schools such as Columbia Pacific when it still had full institutional approval. Knightsbridge and Trinity C&U were not just unaccredited, they were scams.
Apart from you not knowing anything about KU I agree with the rest of it.
|
