George Gollin (George D. Gollin, George Dana Gollin) Dirty Laundry Still Available

[llkk]

Didn't Golin head up the SRU investigation? Looks like someone did a very bad job if this is true:
http://www.hep.uiuc.edu/home/g-gollin/pi...miss_1.pdf

[Randall Flagg]

No, ole George just thinks he was the star of the show. He knows as much about a real investigation as does John Bear. No, it was paid government people who did all the work. George did all the crowing. Now he did a first rate job of that.

George posts things about what the investigators and prosecutors are doing and people assume he is in the middle of it. All he is in the middle of is horn blowing, his own. I guess though if it works for John Bear it might well work for Gollin.

"Every ass loves to hear himself bray."
--English

[Whatever]

No, ole George just thinks he was the star of the show. He knows as much about a real investigation as does John Bear. No, it was paid government people who did all the work. George did all the crowing. Now he did a first rate job of that.

There can be no doubt that George is the star of this show. He may have used the government to do his dirty work, but it is his own personal vendetta. That is obvious.

How come Gollin isn't parading and boasting about the information in this link? He seems to love posting other official documents - but not this one...

[llkk]

In all fairness to Georgey he did post it - http://www.hep.uiuc.edu/home/g-gollin/pi...miss_1.pdf is his page.
Troubling however that if this filing is true, the SRU creeps may go free. Anyone up to asking George his opinon on this?

[Whatever]

In all fairness to Georgey he did post it - http://www.hep.uiuc.edu/home/g-gollin/pi...miss_1.pdf  is his page.
Troubling however that if this filing is true, the SRU creeps may go free.  Anyone up to asking George his opinon on this?

FWIW, I am still interested in knowing what REALLY happened.
My thinkiing is that intelligent individuals do not automatically trust the government, or the media, ...or DD, or GG or Gus...
"In all fairness to Georgey" he did NOT post this to the DD gang. He placed it only at his UIUC vendetta site....and never said a word to his cronies. Makes ya wonder...doesn't it?
Yes, by all means, ask the great leader. LOL!

[Whatever]

In all fairness to Georgey he did post it - http://www.hep.uiuc.edu/home/g-gollin/pi...miss_1.pdf  is his page.
Troubling however that if this filing is true, the SRU creeps may go free.  Anyone up to asking George his opinon on this?

He also "forgot" to post these at the DD Dumb Down.  Any attorneys here?

http://www.hep.uiuc.edu/home/g-gollin/pi...onse_1.pdf
http://www.hep.uiuc.edu/home/g-gollin/pi...ress_1.pdf

[Brian Crawford]

Didn't Golin head up the SRU investigation?  Looks like someone did a very bad job if this is true:
http://www.hep.uiuc.edu/home/g-gollin/pi...miss_1.pdf

Head up the SRU investigation. LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! He was a snitch for the USSS and they actually gave him credibility despite his threatening all involved according to him with a rifle scope! LOL!!!!
That idiot could not catch his ass with both hands. His wife is his bosses boss, his daughter is come out of the closet at 16 and he hopes to be a phyics department chair some day. LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!

After unsucussfully talking Regis University into suing SRU and looking like and making them look like an asshole. Regis ended up with a 200K legal bill they tried to recoup and those lawyers called Gollin "a lose cannon" after the judge denied their request. LOL!!!!!!!!!!

Now if that isn't stalking, what is?

[ham]

So we all know who got George his job as a university professor in the first place.

That is more common than let believe...the bigger fish in the duo gets a job for the smaller one, but typically it is about aging scholars 50-60yo who get a job for their lass in her 20-30...

Why in God's name anyone would waste their time listening to these clowns is beyond me. There are real school guides out there and real college presidents and professors who know and can give good advice on the degree programs that are right for the individual.

I was another sucker who bought Bear's guides, many years ago.
These days a few phone calls and emails take care of any problem.
1. I inquire about their accreditation
2. I inquire about the course/program of choice
3. I make sure I have properly understood their offer/policy in its entirety (EG fees, exclusions, etc )
4. I compare with similar offers
5. I make a choice

[Randall Flagg]

At one time Bear did provide a service in that he did give the names and addresses of many schools providing DL. In fact that's all he was doing. His advice was all but useless as it was biased, wrong, and in some cases. misleading. He claimed to be an expert, he said follow my very excellent advice and you'll get what you want, actually what we got was what he wanted. He adveristsed his own schools, he attacked schools that were in competition. Bear was in it to make money, not to provide the most up to date, accurate, honest, information possible.
As a listing of schools the guides were fair, many of the addresses were out of date. He updated the guides slowly and when absolutely necessary to keep them selling.
As a guide to those schools the (so called guides were useless).

A school would start out very basic with less than great material. As it improved and got better Bear's review of that school would remain the same. If it was one of the schools that had refused to provide him information, in a snit he might well continue negative remarks long after the school had much improved. BIAS? laziness? some of one and lots of the other. The point being that he would give poor information by ignorance and by intent. Phone book-yes, Guide book-no.

[Brian Crawford]

At one time Bear did provide a service in that he did give the names and addresses of many schools providing DL. In fact that's all he was doing. His advice was all but useless as it was biased, wrong, and in some cases. misleading. He claimed to be an expert, he said follow my very excellent advice and you'll get what you want, actually what we got was what he wanted. He adveristsed his own schools, he attacked schools that were in competition.  Bear was in it to make money, not to provide the most up to date, accurate, honest, information possible.
As a listing of schools the guides were fair, many of the addresses were out of date. He updated the guides slowly and when absolutely necessary to keep them selling.
As a guide to those schools the (so called guides were useless).

True, but none of us knew at that time that Bear was getting paid off by the schools he was touting and even fewer of us know that Bear had stock or other ownership interest in some of them he highly recommended.

A school would start out very basic with less than great material. As it improved and got better Bear's review of that school would remain the same. If it was one of the schools that had refused to provide him information, in a snit he might well continue negative remarks long after the school had much improved. BIAS? laziness? some of one and lots of the other. The point being that he would give poor information by ignorance and by intent. Phone book-yes, Guide book-no.