The Arcana Society of Quinn Tyler Jackson - another intellectual abortion by Quinn

[Neilist]

1. Was Harris's paper reviewed?
a) Yes
b) No

2.  If the answer to the previous question is "Yes," identify the person or persons who reviewed it.

3. If the answer to question 1 is "Yes," were any errors found in the paper?
a) Yes
b) No

Can Canadians plead the Fifth?

Was it reviewed? The journal's editor claimed it wasn't -- that it somehow got in by mistake

This is a red herring by intellectually-dishonest Quinn.

There were supposedly two reviews - one by Quinn's "closed list" (*guffaw*), and another by an online math journal.

Here, Quinn is shifting attention away from his "closed list" (*cough cough bullshit cough*) to the online math journal.

IGNORE THE ONLINE MATH JOURNAL ISSUE!

Quinn made representations to sci.math that James Harris' paper was reviewed by a "closed list", but Quinn is also being weasel-like and say he "heard" or "understood" that the "closed list" reviewed it.

My big fat bone ... of contention is that Quinn Tyler Jackson made false representations purporting personal knowledge of events which he refuses, even today, to corroborate with personally known facts, in order to cover and lend credibility to his buddy James Harris.

If Quinn had NO knowledge of any review by a "closed list", then Quinn LIED, wove factual statements from his ASS, and misrepresented a serious issue - the review of a mathematical paper to be or which had been submitted for professional publication.

Quinn throws in red herrings that the online journal should not have yanked the Harris paper. But the issue is the activities of the "closed list" (cough cough fucking lies cough).

Meanwhile ...