07-09-2010, 07:34 PM
(This post was last modified: 07-09-2010, 07:35 PM by dooglearse.)
ham Wrote:Can you please point out where exactly did I say "inappropriate" or something? I think I did not. If I did not, what is that you have destroyed, exactly?
Quite right. It was said by another anonymous poster (with 5 posts total). My mistake.
Quote:By your standards then, every telemarketer could get a doctorate tomorrow by virtue of the thousands of survey calls he made...or not?
My opinion is he could, like that guy who surveyed the presence of 70 immigrants. It isn't illegal...it is a short-cut. There are surveys AND surveys...you did not survey say the marriage records of an entire county during 2 centuries...did you?
If you notice, I said nothing about surveys in general.
This is why I merged the two--same argument. But whether it's coming from one or two directions (hard to tell), it is false. There are many types of surveys and mine certainly was an appropriate method in order to test my hypotheses. That you have a different opinion is fine, but you're not backing it up with any authority. You cite neither your own qualifications to make such an assessment, nor authoritative sources that support it.
Quote:Beef? You've opened the season on ducks for 7 pages...come on guys, let it rest.
I offered to do just that, but he continued. Note who started this thread as well. It is imbalanced to equate us. I'm the respondent, not the initiator. It will rest when he stops posting one unfounded (and ridiculously premised) lie after another in threads he initiates.


?