06-24-2010, 06:33 PM
(This post was last modified: 06-24-2010, 06:35 PM by RespectableGent.)
I don't believe that a substitution of lawyers is grounds for dismissal.
However if monetary damages were caused to the school by American actors, he still has a case.
I would have preferred it if Dr. Dolphin sued George Gollin personally and the University of Illinois directly, but involving Liberia in the lawsuit may have been necessary to demonstrate to the court that SLSOM was indeed accredited under Liberian law and was persecuted and bullied with the help and support of American parties.
On what grounds are the motions to dismiss?
However if monetary damages were caused to the school by American actors, he still has a case.
I would have preferred it if Dr. Dolphin sued George Gollin personally and the University of Illinois directly, but involving Liberia in the lawsuit may have been necessary to demonstrate to the court that SLSOM was indeed accredited under Liberian law and was persecuted and bullied with the help and support of American parties.
On what grounds are the motions to dismiss?