Hello everyone here, the last and only forum where the right of free speech and expressing one's views freely is fully respected!
I have just been kicked out from DD without a warning. It seems that although they tolerate abusive posts of all kinds, they couldn't handle my matter of fact, civil and objective approach. Those guys have proven beyond any doubt that they are intellectually challenged - in the medical/diagnostic sense of the term.
Before they disabled my account, they let loose two of the more moronic stooges that frequent that board, Jack and someone who calls himself Duces Tecum. Duces Tecum pretends to be a new poster who came to the rescue of Gollin. It's quite obvious though that he is one of the regular morons using an alternate persona. Most probably Bill Huffman.
The funniest thing is that Duces Tecum/Bill Huffman or whoever that imbecile might be, tried to correct my grammar as part of his hysterical attempts to discredit me. In one of my posts addressed to Jack I wrote: "...your post will have the exactly opposite effect on a reader to the one intended." Which Duces Tecum "corrected" as follows: "That would be "of," not "to," grammar boy. Your staggering educational deficits continue to glare no matter how you're logged-in."
I don't remember in what grade, but I'm sure it was in elementary school, where we learnt that when "opposite" is used to mean difference, it is always followed by "to", not "of". It would appear that some of those guys haven't even graduated from elementary school. I wonder, isn't Gollin embarrassed to be not just supported, but represented by such people?
Now about Gollin. We don't know yet of the merits (if any) of the St. Luke case, however, the two threads at DD, the "mystery list" and the one about the Russian university and its agents in New York are most damning. They show beyond doubt that George Gollin is a frivolous and flippant person who totally lacks integrity and objectivity. He is an embarrassment to academia and a possible menace to society as he obviously doesn't give a hoot about the damage his irresponsible statements and actions may cause to other people.
Actually, those two DD threads could be used as evidence against Gollin. For this reason, I have saved them just in case they are deleted.
Rockon
I have just been kicked out from DD without a warning. It seems that although they tolerate abusive posts of all kinds, they couldn't handle my matter of fact, civil and objective approach. Those guys have proven beyond any doubt that they are intellectually challenged - in the medical/diagnostic sense of the term.
Before they disabled my account, they let loose two of the more moronic stooges that frequent that board, Jack and someone who calls himself Duces Tecum. Duces Tecum pretends to be a new poster who came to the rescue of Gollin. It's quite obvious though that he is one of the regular morons using an alternate persona. Most probably Bill Huffman.
The funniest thing is that Duces Tecum/Bill Huffman or whoever that imbecile might be, tried to correct my grammar as part of his hysterical attempts to discredit me. In one of my posts addressed to Jack I wrote: "...your post will have the exactly opposite effect on a reader to the one intended." Which Duces Tecum "corrected" as follows: "That would be "of," not "to," grammar boy. Your staggering educational deficits continue to glare no matter how you're logged-in."
I don't remember in what grade, but I'm sure it was in elementary school, where we learnt that when "opposite" is used to mean difference, it is always followed by "to", not "of". It would appear that some of those guys haven't even graduated from elementary school. I wonder, isn't Gollin embarrassed to be not just supported, but represented by such people?
Now about Gollin. We don't know yet of the merits (if any) of the St. Luke case, however, the two threads at DD, the "mystery list" and the one about the Russian university and its agents in New York are most damning. They show beyond doubt that George Gollin is a frivolous and flippant person who totally lacks integrity and objectivity. He is an embarrassment to academia and a possible menace to society as he obviously doesn't give a hoot about the damage his irresponsible statements and actions may cause to other people.
Actually, those two DD threads could be used as evidence against Gollin. For this reason, I have saved them just in case they are deleted.
Rockon