02-14-2010, 08:27 AM
Albert?Hidel Wrote:Wrong!
No way! That's a direct hit! Using Gollin-speak, there are never any wrong answers!
It is possible that "don't believe your own eyes" might have been used in an imprecise fashion, where "blame it on the British government," "hair-splitting, weasel-words and sophistry" and "irrelevant ad hominem invective" would have been the actual intent.
Try this on your wife: "Honey, it is possible that 'I'll be back in a few minutes' might have been used in an imprecise fashion, where 'I'll be home drunk at 3 AM' would have been the actual intent." She'll be so impressed by your giant intellect and irrefutable logic that you'll never sleep on the sofa again.
I'm waiting for Dear Leader to make a speech: "It is possible that 'hope and change' might have been used in an imprecise fashion, where 'higher taxes and nationalization of major sectors of the economy' would have been the actual intent." Repeal the 22nd Amendment, that guy should be good for five terms!