07-15-2009, 01:23 AM
Fort Bragg Wrote:ham Wrote:Quote:The heading was "Ward Churchill wins, judge nullifies verdict." That explains it.
can't seem to find it...
Second paragraph. " Naves vacated an April ruling by a jury in the case that found that Churchill had been inappropriately fired."
The article is confusing...
If the judge 'made legally void' an April ruling, and that turned to Churchill's advantage, why does the same
Quote:And Naves went out of his way to stress that he found the university's findings of misconduct credible, and that the return of Churchill to the faculty would be damaging.?
Not surprisingly, the university praised the decision and Churchill denounced it.
It shows I have no degree in physics but I struggle to see what Churchill exactly won.
A.A Mole University
B.A London Institute of Applied Research
B.Sc Millard Fillmore
M.A International Institute for Advanced Studies
Ph.D London Institute of Applied Research
Ph.D Millard Fillmore
B.A London Institute of Applied Research
B.Sc Millard Fillmore
M.A International Institute for Advanced Studies
Ph.D London Institute of Applied Research
Ph.D Millard Fillmore