George Gollin Attacks US Military

[Martin Eisenstadt]

Threats against judges, prosecutors escalate

Threats are emerging in cases large and small, on the Internet, by telephone, in letters and in person. In Washington, D.C., two men have pleaded not guilty to charges of vowing to kill a federal prosecutor and kidnap her adult son if she didn't drop a homicide investigation. The judge in the CIA leak case received threatening letters when he ordered prison time for I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, Vice President Dick Cheney's former chief of staff. A man near Richmond, Va., was charged with mailing threats to a prosecutor over three traffic offenses. The face of a federal judge in Washington, D.C., was put in a rifle's cross hairs on the Internet after he issued a controversial environmental ruling, judicial sources said.

I can't locate the actual internet posting, but apparently it looked a lot like this:

David Gonzales, a U.S. marshal in Arizona, said deputies put the judge under 24-hour protection for about a month, guarding his home, screening his mail and escorting him to court, to the gym and to Mass.

So maybe Dixie and company aren't really incarcerated after all, but just under 24-hour protection from some frustrated, violent, anti-social mental case?

More on this point: The Predictable Consequence of Waco Rules: "You can discover what your enemy fears most by observing the means he uses to frighten you."

Jackie Junti sends the link to a Seattle Times story below, with her comments, including a quote from Eric Hoffer: "You can discover what your enemy fears most by observing the means he uses to frighten you."

According to the story, people in black robes are getting frightened. Given outrages of justice such as the Olofson case, I reckon they have a right to be.

I have long contended, attempting to warn those who think the Leviathan can act with impunity, that if the law and the Constitution no longer protect us, then it no longer protects them either. This is the predictable consequence of Waco Rules, reinforced by the object lesson of the blatant framing of David Olofson. Why, if we cannot expect a fair trial in federal court, SHOULD we respect federal judges? There is certainly no incentive to do so.

And if federal judges have the long-term memory of a fruit fly, many American citizens remember what they do not. They have forgotten the Original Sin of Waco, but we have not.

They have forgotten the multiple miscarriages of justice that characterized that federal massacre of citizens at the hands of their own government, but we have not.

They have forgotten that no one in the federal constabulary or the Mandarin class of politicians and judges was ever held to account for it, but we have not.

They have forgotten it because they wish to forget it, but we who wish to remain free cannot.

Even sixteen years later, therefore, Waco is not an unfortunate scar upon the body politic as some would conveniently believe, it is an oozing abscess that still threatens to become a deadly systemic infection.

You see, we remember why the FBI chose to conclude the stand-off with an assault on 19 April, the birthday of Eliot Ness, the ATF's patron saint.

We remember why, even as the flames leaped over the funeral pyre of dead babies, that the FBI went in and raised an ATF flag with four stars on it -- marking the four dead ATF agents who died in the original assault.

We understand the message the FBI was sending -- WE are the Leviathan. YOU do not DARE kill any of US, even in legitimate self-defense (which is what a Texas jury later found it to be) without being paid back 20 to 1, even if that means we asphyxiate and burn your women and children along with you.

If we believe Eric Hoffer, the FBI has shown us what the Leviathan fears -- death, personal or impersonal as your perspective might be -- death at twenty of them to every one of their victims.

Can we then expect, as the Gangster Government grows more rapacious and its depredations upon life, liberty and property grow more widespread and tyrannical, and the opportunities for redress within the system become fewer to the point of becoming a bad joke of mythical memory, that employees of that criminal gang will NOT be assassinated?

I do not advocate the assassination of federal employees, but given the twin abscesses of Waco Rules and now Olofson Rules, I understand the thought process.

The author is talking about the government's Waco massacre, and not it's trumped up diploma mill prosecutions, but the parallels seem obvious. The higher education accreditation cartel is telling us that THEY are the Leviathan, and that federal judges sitting on the board of trustees of your largest local competitor will be happy to administer "justice" on their behalf.


"Why, if we cannot expect a fair trial in federal court, SHOULD we respect federal judges? There is certainly no incentive to do so."