George Dana Gollin has a new victim to stalk

[Brian Crawford]

I would like to point out that with all the gangs name calling and posturing and pontificating in this thread, they did not show one single bit of information or proof about the doings of any of the schools.  Nothing about tests, books, quality of staff or instruction, why? because they don't have the slightest clue as to what the schools do or require. They say this or that is a degree mill and wouldn't know a test or requirement for any of them. They know they don't like something and then make up the facts later on to show why.  Apparently a degree mill is proven once the gang doesn't like a school. They should try a new idea at DD, actually find out what a school does and requires before they post their dislike. This "I say you are guilty, now prove me wrong" stuff is getting very old and boring. It's a damn poor bait for the trap.

If the brave lads have the goods on some school they should show the details, if not, it's all just hype and noise (as usual) from the light weights too busy to do any discovery and research.

Oh, hell no, they need not show proof of their claims. They just call this woman's employer and let the employer do the research and investigation. This is the typical John Bear stalking technique as he trained Gollin to ruin a person's career by placing them under the  microscope, even though it looked like a rifle scope when Gollin does it. (He just had his graphics mixed up.) Call the target's employer and contact the local news media, then let them sort it out.

It is typical John Bear, like when he had Good Morning America going to people's places of employment with a camera crew in two. That's the academic quality and ethics the gang of Bear, Gollin, Contreras and now Ezell prefer.