07-02-2007, 04:04 AM
In the beginning I thought I could debate and discuss things at DI and change minds. I knew that unaccredited degrees were much more usable than the gang was saying, how? I have had them for years, first hand experience. I also saw them saying things like, "DETC schools would not be acceptable except in rare instances." After several research studies I found that DETC schools are acceptable to about 97% of employers and will transfer to about 60% of regionally accredited schools and to most nationally accredited schools. The unaccredited schools are accepted at roughly 5-10% of accredited schools. In employment about 96% of private employers will see the degrees from unaccredited colleges as being positive to good.
What we had was the truth, unaccredited schools have value and usability and the nationally accredited schools are accepted almost the same as the bottom end RA schools such as Excelsior.
No, you won't be teaching at Yale with two degrees from Pacific Western University and you will also not be teaching at Yale if you only have degrees from the big three plus a few more such schools, one being Union.
What I never caught on to, in the beginning, was that they (the gang) wasn't being ignorant, they were deliberately lying to enhance their own positions, such as, RA or No Way. One could provide many reasons why grown men would lie and distort facts trying to attack other people, attempting to prove the unprovable, that schools such as TESC and Excelsior/ Capella are just the same as schools such as the University of Texas / Penn. State University. They lie for selfish reasons and to satisfy their weird needs.
The hard-core at DI are different in life-style and in their views of life. I believe they are incapable of argument and debate. They need to be enhanced and made more. Any discussion must conform to these needs and how they view themselves. The gang isn't about quality and usability, but about what they have done being good and it being better than what someone else has done. Go to DI if you will but you won't be welcome unless you are willing to treat average people with challenging problems as if they are experts and special. They want to be treated as good while acting very bad. Now that doesn't happen very often in life.
What we had was the truth, unaccredited schools have value and usability and the nationally accredited schools are accepted almost the same as the bottom end RA schools such as Excelsior.
No, you won't be teaching at Yale with two degrees from Pacific Western University and you will also not be teaching at Yale if you only have degrees from the big three plus a few more such schools, one being Union.
What I never caught on to, in the beginning, was that they (the gang) wasn't being ignorant, they were deliberately lying to enhance their own positions, such as, RA or No Way. One could provide many reasons why grown men would lie and distort facts trying to attack other people, attempting to prove the unprovable, that schools such as TESC and Excelsior/ Capella are just the same as schools such as the University of Texas / Penn. State University. They lie for selfish reasons and to satisfy their weird needs.
The hard-core at DI are different in life-style and in their views of life. I believe they are incapable of argument and debate. They need to be enhanced and made more. Any discussion must conform to these needs and how they view themselves. The gang isn't about quality and usability, but about what they have done being good and it being better than what someone else has done. Go to DI if you will but you won't be welcome unless you are willing to treat average people with challenging problems as if they are experts and special. They want to be treated as good while acting very bad. Now that doesn't happen very often in life.
James
A.S., B.S., M.B.A.
A.S., B.S., M.B.A.
