11-09-2008, 06:40 PM
I never typed the words 'he claimed'
I referred to third party comments.
Unlike you, I can't claim to know the inside of Obama's soul or to read tarots...I only know what the press publishes or people tell themselves.
See?
You came here all hot&bothered and wanted 'proof' about the third party (sarcastic ) comment 'Quaker'...
yet right now you both say you don't care he may be a Muslim and that his statement may just be a 'freudian slip'...since he got Muslim education that's a bit harder to believe, but if you say so.
If you don't care he may be a Muslim (I still use 'may' while his taped statement requires 'is' ) because it's a free country, why did you pick the Quaker battle? Wouldn't the country still be free if he was a Quaker?
Lastly, you screamed for 'proofs', but when one taped statement is provided, you doubt it...
You doubt a taped statement but you think you can argue he's 'unitedchurchofchristian'...
Based on what?
What he said? But he said he's a Muslim, too!
Based on your opinion?
Your opinion is no better than mine.
We both know the reality...
You are annoyed if anyone says something that -in your opinion- doesn't compliment your candidate .
Being annoyed, you pick stupid fights...
Quote:Muslim education in a Muslim country is just part of what makes him a wonderful, rounded-up, awesome and open-minded individual to make us dream (so preaches a Jewish AAA+ analyst on TV right now ).
He's a Quaker now...we all deserve a second chance...Fujimori was billed Roman Catholic...
I referred to third party comments.
Unlike you, I can't claim to know the inside of Obama's soul or to read tarots...I only know what the press publishes or people tell themselves.
Quote:Regarding your youtube clip, who cares if he's a Muslim? I don't. Why should you? This is a free country and one has the right to hold whatever religious beliefs one chooses. However, I doubt he is a Muslim. We all make so-called "Freudian slips." Maybe you never have. My hat's off to you.
See?
You came here all hot&bothered and wanted 'proof' about the third party (sarcastic ) comment 'Quaker'...
Quote:He left Trinity United Church of Christ. He may still list the United Church of Christ as his denominational preference.
yet right now you both say you don't care he may be a Muslim and that his statement may just be a 'freudian slip'...since he got Muslim education that's a bit harder to believe, but if you say so.
If you don't care he may be a Muslim (I still use 'may' while his taped statement requires 'is' ) because it's a free country, why did you pick the Quaker battle? Wouldn't the country still be free if he was a Quaker?
Lastly, you screamed for 'proofs', but when one taped statement is provided, you doubt it...
You doubt a taped statement but you think you can argue he's 'unitedchurchofchristian'...
Based on what?
What he said? But he said he's a Muslim, too!
Based on your opinion?
Your opinion is no better than mine.
We both know the reality...
You are annoyed if anyone says something that -in your opinion- doesn't compliment your candidate .
Being annoyed, you pick stupid fights...
A.A Mole University
B.A London Institute of Applied Research
B.Sc Millard Fillmore
M.A International Institute for Advanced Studies
Ph.D London Institute of Applied Research
Ph.D Millard Fillmore
B.A London Institute of Applied Research
B.Sc Millard Fillmore
M.A International Institute for Advanced Studies
Ph.D London Institute of Applied Research
Ph.D Millard Fillmore

