Who Does This Describe?

[Armando Ramos]

Not to put too fine a point on it, but that's like a bunch of answers rolled into one.

I don't disagree with that. But focusing on the docs, he either lied about writing the dissertation himself or he lied about the other 15 people writing the article. He's in a logical box and can't have it both ways. A lie is a lie. George Gollin (George D. Gollin, George Dana Gollin) is a proven liar. And since the lie goes to the heart of his academic credentials (i.e., his purported "legitimate" doctorate) he is an academic fraud in my opinion as well. So we are on the same page there. For him to be acting as an "informant" for the feds and stalking people he thinks have credentials inferior to his is just abject hypocrisy. He is a fraud, his degree is a fraud, his "informing" is fraudulent, his entire reason for existence is fraudulent.