Sorbon Guy Banned

[ham]

My point - why the fear of discussion?

ECOLE / UNIVERSITE ROBERT DE SORBON has been discussed as nauseam; their hype...ehm...loopholes hold no more water than Warnborough's 'iso9000' accreditation ,although Warnborough is and was much less active trolling and 'spreading the word'.
I'll say it again: 'unaccredited' degrees, ok... maybe one wants to pull a fast one; maybe he doesn't know better; maybe the school is good...
HOWEVER
I say it's nonsense to peddle the 'freedom in academia' item and to denounce traditional accreditation only to revert back to bogus accreditation and other silly acronyms: either accreditation is bogus, or it's useful...
1. if traditional accreditation is bogus, why would accreditation from Congo or some other word twist acronym be any better?
2. if accreditation is useful, why do I need it from Uganda?

As far as the wild bunch of perverts or keyboard sociopaths at DI/DD, I always suggested that they are in bed with (some) millists to supply them with publicity and word of mouth...bad word of mouth IS word of mouth nonetheless.

This explains why some mills are simply finger pointed & discarded; others are ignored and a few receive recurring, in-depth focus and attention; every time threads go on for ages, only to be resurrected by some grandstand act and ultimately closed...to resurface once again for more drama to unfold.
Think of it, it's John Bear 's method... publicizing certain mills under the cover of indexing them as dangerous.

For example, I personally think that http://www.chumsci.edu/ looks awesome at face value (I haven't studied with them so I can't tell); it got DETC accreditation, which to some is little more than a mill's, but I wouldn't hesitate to give them a try because their programs look good to me.