The Arcana Society of Quinn Tyler Jackson - another intellectual abortion by Quinn

[Neilist]

Two mathematicians read the paper on Ultranet, based upon the messages I still have in my archive. One non-mathematician also read it. Don't expect me to spell it all out for you. Andrew Beckwith has a PhD in mathematics, as far as I know, and another in physics. His posts on sci.math are already in the public records -- don't expect me to do your homework for you.

As for Beckwith being eccentric -- this is also quite well-known on the Internet.

So quit putting it out as if I am trying to protect anything related to IQ.

And go take your Haldol, you fucking psychotic twit.

How can anyone even believe what you say, that "Two mathematicians read the paper on Ultranet, based upon the messages I still have in my archive"  ?

You won't publish such messages in your "archive", right?  How convenient.  We only have what you say to go on.  Ha!  What a joke you are, Quinn!

And you hoist "eccentric" Beckwith as an example of a mathematics reviewer.  Aha!  You're disparaging Beckwith and forestalling criticism to stop others from pointing out his eccentricity and thus undermining YOUR credibility.  So you both give Beckwith as an example, then undermine him before anyone undermines YOU!

You're a sneaky evil bastard, Quinn.  You can't be intellectually honest for one second.

Even more, in this very thread, you said:

"Beckwith's PhDs are in physics and mathematics, I believe ... can't recall from where. Yes -- he's quite the character -- but there's one. A whack of published papers behind 'm if recollection serves me right."

Hey Quinn, you represent, you allege, you put forth (where's my thesaurus?) that Beckwith maybe has a PhD in Math, but you hedge and say "I believe ... can't recall from where" and you think Beckwith may have published "papers" ... "if recollection serves me".

So, Quinn, these are facts???  You pull shit out of your ass and we should just accept what you say are diamonds?

Quinn, you are intellectually dishonest!  High IQ?  Ha!

Then Quinn, you say in this thread:

"So essentially this is all about my not revealing the name of the second math person who read the paper and said it stood. If you belong to a group, and one of the rules of membership is that other members' info is to be kept confidential -- it is unethical to reveal that information."

That, of course, ASSUMES you are telling the truth, Quinn, about the "closed list" and its "rules" which you are ethically bound to obey.

(cough hack cough bullshit hack cough cough*)

How can ANYONE verify a single thing you say, with lame representations of such "facts" about that infamous "closed list"?

If it can't be verified, you can say anything you like, right?

No, Quinn, you can't say what you like, since others like me take your evasiveness not as ethical or noble, but craven and pathetic, as well as egotistical and self-serving.  Sooooo convenient for you, and so sad for those seeking the TRUTH!

Well, you protect James Harris, and the company you keep and your behavior with that company reflects on YOU, Quinn.

Quinn, you've been challenged, measured, and found wanting.

I've said it for years:  "closed list" = sheer bullshit.

Also, oooo, you're calling me psychotic.  I should SUE YOU FOR LIBEL!  Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!

There's an old joke:  if you call me psychotic again, I'll KILL YOU!!!

But that's a joke, and I've never said I'd kill you.

But I've also said that Quinn, you shouldn't KILL YOURSELF or DIE OF PAINFUL AIDS!  Nope, you shouldn't DIE DIE DIE, QUINN, DIE DIE DIE.

Eh, go back to your closet ... I mean "closed list", Quinn, where your "buddy" James Harris awaits to comfort your hurt feelings with a good internal massage with his HAMMER!