12-22-2007, 05:50 AM
(This post was last modified: 12-22-2007, 05:51 AM by Randall Flagg.)
Especially when the pundits are most likely to recommend the schools paying them or the ones they have used. In other words they are biased.
Someone giving advice needs to have some knowledge that you need, be honest and sincere, and most of all, be accurate. Do I trust them for any or all of this? no I don't. I trust them to do for themselves what is best.
They said Virginia International was good enough, but that CCU was not good enough.
They told me that Greenwich was good enough, but that Newport was not.
IIAS was good, but Kensington wasn't.
CPU was, according to them, one of the very best, but today, it wasn't very good, or so they say.
What they say is what they say, biased opinion, nothing more. Even if you listened to them they may well condemn you for doing the very thing they recommended. They will tell you that their recommendation was accurate and proper but if you listened to them and took that advice, you are a fake and fraud. Now how is that for logic?
Someone giving advice needs to have some knowledge that you need, be honest and sincere, and most of all, be accurate. Do I trust them for any or all of this? no I don't. I trust them to do for themselves what is best.
They said Virginia International was good enough, but that CCU was not good enough.
They told me that Greenwich was good enough, but that Newport was not.
IIAS was good, but Kensington wasn't.
CPU was, according to them, one of the very best, but today, it wasn't very good, or so they say.
What they say is what they say, biased opinion, nothing more. Even if you listened to them they may well condemn you for doing the very thing they recommended. They will tell you that their recommendation was accurate and proper but if you listened to them and took that advice, you are a fake and fraud. Now how is that for logic?
James
A.S., B.S., M.B.A.
A.S., B.S., M.B.A.