02-22-2012, 04:35 AM
(02-21-2012, 06:39 AM)Ben Johnson Wrote: Relating to this:
http://www.thepubliccourt.com/
Looks like on January 10, 2011, Dr. Emad Tadros filed an in pro per complaint in Los Angeles Superior Court against the American College of Forensic Examiners Institute.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/47223585/Tadro...-vs-ACFEI-
Tadros' original beef seems to be with Dr. Stephen Doyne, who provided Tadros a court-ordered custody evaluation in 2005. Tadros takes issue with a number of aspects of Doyne's credentials, among them that Doyne is certified by ACFEI, which Tadros describes as a "diploma mill."
ACFEI is operated by Robert O'Block. On December 27, 2010, O'Block's attorneys were threatening Tadros with action regarding "defamatory material" allegedly published by Tadros.
http://www.thepubliccourt.com/images/ACF...3010_1.jpg
On November 10, 2011, Tadros also filed an in pro per complaint in US District Court in San Diego against both ACFEI and Robert O'Block.
http://dockets.justia.com/docket/califor...22/369052/
Although Tadros writes passionately about these events, it is obvious that English is not his native language and as a result his accounts are not altogether clear. My guess is that if O'Block got sued he filed a counterclaim against Tadros and anyone else he considered responsible for trade libel.
Might be interesting to take a look at the dockets and see whether Goose and Klempner are actually defendants or perhaps just responding to discovery requests. That Klempner wants to discuss "our response to the lawsuit" and not, for example, "your response to the subpena" suggests it may be the former.
Check that homeowners insurance policy, Goose! You might be surprised at what kind of lawsuits you can get them to defend.