11-30-2007, 10:38 AM
ham Wrote:I only question how people who are fervent advocates of non-accreditation ( EG freedom in academia ), then spend so much time arguing that their largely unaccredited results are the same as those garnered through accredited education;
I object to the accredited is good/unaccredited is bad dichotomy. The mediocrity of public education dispels that theory.
People may choose to spend a few grand on a reasonably demanding unaccredited doctorate instead of the 40 grand for a Douglas type Mickey Mouse accredited degree.
There are real reasons to EARN an unaccredited doctorate.

