04-22-2010, 06:54 AM
Virtual Bison Wrote:Is there a reason why this article does not include George being named in the lawsuit? It is public information. And no matter how many times Tallmagic tries to sabatoge it, he cannot deny the truth.
Those Wikipedo types do all seem to have, shall we say, a certain affinity, don't they?
Here's one possible explanation:
Erik Möller, No. 2 at Wikipedia, a defender of pedophilia
Category:Pedophile Wikipedia Editors
I just discovered to my surprise - actually, horror - that Wikimedia Commons hosts illegal pedophilia. For shame.
The other issue is the fact that an irrelevant non-celebrity non-hacker like Gollum even has a Wikipedo page in the first place. Notice that there is no Gollin page at Conservapedia.
Except in his own mind, Gollin is less than irrelevant. That is, after all, why he had to start proclaiming himself an "expert" in accreditation, because nobody who knew anything was taking him seriously as an "expert" in physics.
Although, if they manage to count all the dead Liberian babies for which he is responsible he might be worthy of mention here.