Since I'm the one that posted this let me clarify something: I'm not saying what the coach did wasn't wrong. It was just plain stupid and the article merely paints a "he said-she said" scenario.
Nowhere does it imply the coach did anything to force these two women to do something against their will. If he actually raped these women then I'd be the first to say cut his balls off, but it appears he just did something stupid so I'm just amazed these women were able to get over a $150,000 a piece for this.
Again this was a bonehead move by the coach, but it appears these women willingly and knowingly engaged in this behavior. Is it so far fetched to think that perhaps these two women did all of this with malicious intent? Or is the coach a dirty scumbag? Both? Who knows???
Nowhere does it imply the coach did anything to force these two women to do something against their will. If he actually raped these women then I'd be the first to say cut his balls off, but it appears he just did something stupid so I'm just amazed these women were able to get over a $150,000 a piece for this.
Again this was a bonehead move by the coach, but it appears these women willingly and knowingly engaged in this behavior. Is it so far fetched to think that perhaps these two women did all of this with malicious intent? Or is the coach a dirty scumbag? Both? Who knows???