Gay Al & Gollin Partner Up

[Herbert Spencer]

Why would anyone collaborate knowingly and voluntarily with an adjudicated civil rights violator and admitted sexual deviant?

Here is what federal judge John S. Rhoades, Sr., had to say about about Anal Contreras:

After a bench trial, the district court found that defendant Contreras had violated plaintiff's constitutional rights. Specifically, the district court concluded that defendant "Contreras' application of the regulations to plaintiff's degrees resulted not from an intent to achieve the goals of the regulations, but because of bias toward the institution from which they were received." That finding is not challenged on appeal....

http://caselaw.findlaw.com/data2/circs/9th/0335975P.pdf

That is, Contreras's bias was against Bob Jones University because of the university's Christian teachings and point of view.  Contreras is nothing more than a religious bigot.  Not only did the trial court rule that he is a religious bigot, the pervert didn't even bother to challenge that finding on appeal.  So it's not just somebody's opinion, it's a proven, adjudicated fact: Contreras is a bigot who hates Christians.

So if George Gollin (George D. Gollin, George Dana Gollin) has his choice and decides to voluntarily associate with such a bigot, one can only conclude it is because Gollin is not the least bit offended by such bigotry, and in all likelihood shares his anti-Christian bias.

Now I know there are some misguided or disengenuous people who would like us to believe that cocksuckers and ass pirates like Conteras are just engaging in some sort of "alternative lifestyle," and not acting in any way contrary to the laws of God, nature or common sense and decency.  On the other hand, I'm not aware of anyone who says that intentionally violating people's civil rights on the grounds of religious hatred is some sort of "alternative belief-style."   It is considered a vile and vicious act worthy of a filthy Nazi or Saracen, not a civilized person and certainly not someone entrusted with enforcing the law and paid with public tax dollars.

So whatever affinity Gollin has for Contreras because of Contreras's deviant sexuality--either because of Gollin's perverted lesbian daughter or perhaps Gollin's own closeted deviance, if any--ought to be irrelevant to him in the face of Contreras's unabashed, unapologetic religious bigotry.  So I agree, the fact that Gollin chooses to team up with such a scumbag as Contreras shows that Gollin himself is a scumbag too.  If you are judged by the company you keep, it seems only fair and fitting that George Gollin (George D. Gollin, George Dana Gollin) should be regarded as a slimy, anti-Christian bigot.

The next questions are why any public tax supported university would want to employ a slimy, anti-Christian bigot, and why a quasi-public agency like CHEA would care to have a slimy, anti-Christian bigot on its board of directors?   For that matter, why is the slimy, anti-Christian bigot Alan Contreras still employed by the State of Oregon?   It's about time somebody took a hard look at these two animals.