02-16-2009, 07:19 AM
[quote=levicoff]
[quote]To my knowledge, although Chip likes young-looking guys ("twinks" in gay lingo), I have never seen any evidence that he is a pedophile and would hope that, in his unrelated-to-DL business endeavors, he is careful enough not to cross the legal line. In other words, if Chip protographs a 10-year-old kid naked, he's legally a pedophile. If he photographs a 19-year-old kid who merely looks 10 years old, he is not. If he gets his rcks off fantasizing a make-believe 10-year-old kid, he's psychologically a pedophile but not legally one. If he has actual porn pictures of a 10-year-old kid, then he has crossed the legal line (and I am not in a position to know whether he has ever had any).[/quote]
I thought Levicoff studied law - Oh! That was at Union. Do they offer law or have any faculty members conversant in the subject? It's such a good school, I guess that's irrelevant.
I might also suggest that the legal definition of pedophilia is irrelevant. I don't know that by common English usage pedophilia doesn't involve creepy looking old men taking pictures of 19 year old children, especially those pretending to look younger.
[quote]To my knowledge, although Chip likes young-looking guys ("twinks" in gay lingo), I have never seen any evidence that he is a pedophile and would hope that, in his unrelated-to-DL business endeavors, he is careful enough not to cross the legal line. In other words, if Chip protographs a 10-year-old kid naked, he's legally a pedophile. If he photographs a 19-year-old kid who merely looks 10 years old, he is not. If he gets his rcks off fantasizing a make-believe 10-year-old kid, he's psychologically a pedophile but not legally one. If he has actual porn pictures of a 10-year-old kid, then he has crossed the legal line (and I am not in a position to know whether he has ever had any).[/quote]
I thought Levicoff studied law - Oh! That was at Union. Do they offer law or have any faculty members conversant in the subject? It's such a good school, I guess that's irrelevant.
I might also suggest that the legal definition of pedophilia is irrelevant. I don't know that by common English usage pedophilia doesn't involve creepy looking old men taking pictures of 19 year old children, especially those pretending to look younger.