Think that it's the first time the 'Obama' routine is pulled? Think again...

[ham]

and have yet to validate your statement.

who cares if he's a Quaker? I don't. Why should you? This is a free country and one has the right to hold whatever religious beliefs one chooses.

If you won't admit you lied or prove he is a Quaker, then the rest of your postings will be suspect. Is this the reputation you want, that you lie?

Coming from whom?
A person who admitted he picked fights without even reading my posts?

Regarding your Bush and the third time for the same party in a row comment, okay. I didn't see the "for the same party in a row" comment so I stand corrected.

I already got called names by the degreeinfo / degreediscussion clique...and showed them the big finger.
The problem here is not the 'reputation' of some anonymous poster called Ham on an anonymous website, but Obama's image...
Not that it changes anything, but I doubt your crusade enhanced his image one little bit...
That is why you selectively ignore how someone who made 4 millions a year and bought a $1.5 million mansion can be called a 'socialist' or partisan of socialism as you do.

Because he's an idiot who is a racist and doesn't know the difference between communism and socialism.

My 'veracity' (as you call it) might need improvement, you said, but I'm glad I am not alone.

Not according to this.

A Wikipedia article?
Great...


According to this, Millard Fillmore, L.I.A.R, Fairfax etc never existed.

PFFT!