George Dana Gollin has a new victim to stalk
#2
I would like to point out that with all the gangs name calling and posturing and pontificating in this thread, they did not show one single bit of information or proof about the doings of any of the schools.  Nothing about tests, books, quality of staff or instruction, why? because they don't have the slightest clue as to what the schools do or require. They say this or that is a degree mill and wouldn't know a test or requirement for any of them. They know they don't like something and then make up the facts later on to show why.  Apparently a degree mill is proven once the gang doesn't like a school. They should try a new idea at DD, actually find out what a school does and requires before they post their dislike. This "I say you are guilty, now prove me wrong" stuff is getting very old and boring. It's a damn poor bait for the trap.

If the brave lads have the goods on some school they should show the details, if not, it's all just hype and noise (as usual) from the light weights too busy to do any discovery and research.
James
A.S., B.S., M.B.A.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
George Dana Gollin has a new victim to stalk - by Brian Crawford - 07-14-2007, 01:55 PM
RE: George Dana Gollin has a new vitime to stalk - by Randall Flagg - 07-14-2007, 04:59 PM
RE: George Dana Gollin has a new vitime to stalk - by Brian Crawford - 07-15-2007, 03:53 AM
RE: George Dana Gollin has a new vitime to stalk - by Brian Crawford - 07-15-2007, 01:08 PM
RE: George Dana Gollin has a new vitime to stalk - by Brian Crawford - 07-16-2007, 04:31 PM
RE: George Dana Gollin has a new vitime to stalk - by Brian Crawford - 07-17-2007, 04:05 AM
RE: George Dana Gollin has a new vitime to stalk - by Brian Crawford - 07-17-2007, 03:27 PM
RE: George Dana Gollin has a new vitime to stalk - by Brian Crawford - 07-18-2007, 05:22 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)