06-05-2008, 04:05 AM
In DLTruth recently, Quinn Tyler Jackson hoisted someone named Beckwith as an anonymous reviewer of a paper by an infamous crank James Harris, with Beckwith and Jackson allegedly being in a "closed list".
But what Quinn didn't say was that this "eccentric" Beckwith "character" was also actively involved in attempted FRAUD to get Harris' mathematical paper published.
On February 29, 2008, Quinn didn't remember the facts about Beckwith.
On sci.math, on February 29,2008, Quinn had an exchange with someone named Mensanator.
Check it out yourself, by searching "beckwith" in sci.math in Google Groups. Or don't, and just read what I verbatim copied:
Mensanator wrote:
> > This is well understood (at least from what I've read).
> > What apparently is not well understood is how this protocol
> > should be applied to cases of outright fraud such as perpetrated
> > by Harris & Beckwith. Some, such as myself, feel the journal
> > was within it's rights to yank the paper although it was wrong
> > to lie about the reasons and not admit it's incompetence.
On Feb 29, 5:35 pm, "Quinn" <quinn_jackson2...@yahoo.ca> wrote:
> Um, Mensanator -- please refresh my recollection on this?
> As I recall, the paper in question was submitted to the original (yanking)
> journal under one name. Beckwith, if I recall, was, indeed one of those who
> reviewed it, and *later* added his name to it. (I don't know what his
> contribution was to the content, if any.)
> So what exactly are you on about? I'm not being snide -- I'm just
>old and
>brandy-soaked, and believe the details are a bit hazy.
Mensanator replied:
"That's my understanding also. Beckwith has admitted here
he added his name to the paper in order to enhance its
acceptance by other journals, not the original journal in
question."
So, I ask, this reviewer Beckwith should be trusted by Quinn? Does Quinn dare to continue referring to Beckwith as one of the reviewers in Quinn's infamous "closed list", with Beckwith having doctorates in physics and mathematics?
The DLTruth folks here shouldn't trust Quinn, when only this past February Quinn was reminded that BECKWITH ADMITTED TO FRAUD!
Quinn conveniently leaves out, in the recent threads in DLTruth, the attempted fraud of one of the alleged "closed list" reviewers, despite the fact that Quinn was reminded of it recently.
Poor Quinn. Poor intellectually dishonest Quinn. Poor ethically-bereft Quinn Tyler Jackson.
Poor poor poor poof poor Quinn Tyler Jackson.
But what Quinn didn't say was that this "eccentric" Beckwith "character" was also actively involved in attempted FRAUD to get Harris' mathematical paper published.
On February 29, 2008, Quinn didn't remember the facts about Beckwith.
On sci.math, on February 29,2008, Quinn had an exchange with someone named Mensanator.
Check it out yourself, by searching "beckwith" in sci.math in Google Groups. Or don't, and just read what I verbatim copied:
Mensanator wrote:
> > This is well understood (at least from what I've read).
> > What apparently is not well understood is how this protocol
> > should be applied to cases of outright fraud such as perpetrated
> > by Harris & Beckwith. Some, such as myself, feel the journal
> > was within it's rights to yank the paper although it was wrong
> > to lie about the reasons and not admit it's incompetence.
On Feb 29, 5:35 pm, "Quinn" <quinn_jackson2...@yahoo.ca> wrote:
> Um, Mensanator -- please refresh my recollection on this?
> As I recall, the paper in question was submitted to the original (yanking)
> journal under one name. Beckwith, if I recall, was, indeed one of those who
> reviewed it, and *later* added his name to it. (I don't know what his
> contribution was to the content, if any.)
> So what exactly are you on about? I'm not being snide -- I'm just
>old and
>brandy-soaked, and believe the details are a bit hazy.
Mensanator replied:
"That's my understanding also. Beckwith has admitted here
he added his name to the paper in order to enhance its
acceptance by other journals, not the original journal in
question."
So, I ask, this reviewer Beckwith should be trusted by Quinn? Does Quinn dare to continue referring to Beckwith as one of the reviewers in Quinn's infamous "closed list", with Beckwith having doctorates in physics and mathematics?
The DLTruth folks here shouldn't trust Quinn, when only this past February Quinn was reminded that BECKWITH ADMITTED TO FRAUD!
Quinn conveniently leaves out, in the recent threads in DLTruth, the attempted fraud of one of the alleged "closed list" reviewers, despite the fact that Quinn was reminded of it recently.
Poor Quinn. Poor intellectually dishonest Quinn. Poor ethically-bereft Quinn Tyler Jackson.
Poor poor poor poof poor Quinn Tyler Jackson.
"closed list" "closed list" "closed list"
"personal space" "personal space" "personal space"
Hey Quinn, I'm laughing at the "superior intellect"
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
"personal space" "personal space" "personal space"
Hey Quinn, I'm laughing at the "superior intellect"
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
