06-03-2008, 09:32 AM
(This post was last modified: 06-03-2008, 09:34 AM by Don Dresden.)
jackson Wrote:So to answer your question, Don -- "rigged" ... I have no clue what you're talking about. Rigged game what?
Here is what Neilist alleged in his previous post:
Quote:When Harris had a mathematical paper rejected by a publisher, Quinn Tyler Jackson claimed that the paper was reviewed by a "closed list" who found no errors.http://www.dltruth.com/showthread.php?ti...71#pid1971
When I and others challenged this claim, Quinn became evasive, insulting, and condescending. His "closed list" were presumably fellow members of the high-IQ Mega Foundation, which supposedly also included James Harris. And Quinn said he was a friend of James Harris.
So not only was Quinn and the "closed list" biased in favor of their friend Harris, Quinn repeatedly rebuffed any scrutiny or corroboration of his own outlandish claim that the Harris paper was reviewed and found to be error free.
Was Harris's paper reviewed, and if so by whom? What errors, if any, were found in the paper?
Simple questions, still not answered despite multiple opportunities. Instead, multiple scattershot personal insults, which seems typical of someone caught in a "misrememberance."
Also, note that when Albert asked Neilist to state his beef Neilist did so, and with clarity and precision. He was asked a straight question and he gave a straight answer. Your turn.
Was Harris's paper reviewed, and if so by whom? What errors, if any, were found in the paper?
