Now the final fog is put in place causing the unsuspecting information seeker to see unaccredited schools as more acceptable than was suggested by the mini research/advertising ploy.
"For example one highly regarded unaccredited program reported that its students have transferred to more than 30 traditional universities, getting credit for work at the unaccredited school.
Another unaccredited university has received letters from Harvard, Yale, and Princeton, among others, indicating a willingness to consider their students for admission to graduate school."
--John Bear-- Bear's Guide --1997-- Page 22
It's obvious that these two schools are one, CPU, and that the information was from JB to CPU and not the other way around.
I ask again. Why would people be so eager to buy into the idea that unaccredited schools were so good and acceptable? Because our guide told them so and twisted the numbers to make it look wonderful.
One can only wonder how much and how often accuracy fell victim to the wants and needs of the GUIDE.
"For example one highly regarded unaccredited program reported that its students have transferred to more than 30 traditional universities, getting credit for work at the unaccredited school.
Another unaccredited university has received letters from Harvard, Yale, and Princeton, among others, indicating a willingness to consider their students for admission to graduate school."
--John Bear-- Bear's Guide --1997-- Page 22
It's obvious that these two schools are one, CPU, and that the information was from JB to CPU and not the other way around.
I ask again. Why would people be so eager to buy into the idea that unaccredited schools were so good and acceptable? Because our guide told them so and twisted the numbers to make it look wonderful.
One can only wonder how much and how often accuracy fell victim to the wants and needs of the GUIDE.