More of the TRUTH.
"Columbia Pacific University"
Listed on page 75 of the 1995 Guide.
No negative comments, only praise.
--John Bear-College Degrees by Mail 100 Good Schools
"Columbia Pacific University"
Listed on page 170 of the 1996 Guide as a good, reputable school.
No negative comments, only praise.
--John Bear--College Degrees by Mail 100 Accredited Schools--Located in the Unaccredited schools section
This from 1999:
"Columbia Pacific lost its State Approval to operate in 1995 after failing a review by the Council for Private Postsecondary and Vocational Education."
--John Bear --AED Thread--Dec. 1999
During and after this event your guides said, "Good." Now how would people buying your guides feel about their paid guide being caught with his britches down? Day late--dollar short.
More: The 1980 guide has you praising CPU as your favorite unaccredited school and going on and on about its quality and acceptance.
BUT--BUT-- There's This:
You make the claim that you have always made it known that you were connected to CPU. No place in the 1980 Guide-- when you were a minority owner- did you say you were connected to CPU. In 1980, in the middle of your ownership, you leave out the fact that you are shilling for a school you own stock in. When an owner praises his own business, it's called advertising, it must be made known. You used your guide to advertise, calling CPU your favorite school, and kept secret that you were one of the owners. Only later did you mention the relationship. Now that makes it shilling.
"Columbia Pacific University"
Listed on page 75 of the 1995 Guide.
No negative comments, only praise.
--John Bear-College Degrees by Mail 100 Good Schools
"Columbia Pacific University"
Listed on page 170 of the 1996 Guide as a good, reputable school.
No negative comments, only praise.
--John Bear--College Degrees by Mail 100 Accredited Schools--Located in the Unaccredited schools section
This from 1999:
"Columbia Pacific lost its State Approval to operate in 1995 after failing a review by the Council for Private Postsecondary and Vocational Education."
--John Bear --AED Thread--Dec. 1999
During and after this event your guides said, "Good." Now how would people buying your guides feel about their paid guide being caught with his britches down? Day late--dollar short.
More: The 1980 guide has you praising CPU as your favorite unaccredited school and going on and on about its quality and acceptance.
BUT--BUT-- There's This:
You make the claim that you have always made it known that you were connected to CPU. No place in the 1980 Guide-- when you were a minority owner- did you say you were connected to CPU. In 1980, in the middle of your ownership, you leave out the fact that you are shilling for a school you own stock in. When an owner praises his own business, it's called advertising, it must be made known. You used your guide to advertise, calling CPU your favorite school, and kept secret that you were one of the owners. Only later did you mention the relationship. Now that makes it shilling.