01-10-2008, 12:07 PM
(This post was last modified: 01-10-2008, 12:09 PM by Randall Flagg.)
On Churchill's writings:
Nearly all of his works are a synthesis and reinterpretation, drawing upon studies by other scholars. They do the work and he RE-WORKS their facts and ideas to fit his ideas and requirements. Most of his work is published in non-mainstream journals that are not peer-reviewed. We don't want them checked too closely do we, or they would be found to be meandering, mistaken, and misstated.
The facts he doesn't twist, he completely misstates. Put it this way. Don't ever quote one of his books or essays without double checking the facts elsewhere.
Nearly all of his works are a synthesis and reinterpretation, drawing upon studies by other scholars. They do the work and he RE-WORKS their facts and ideas to fit his ideas and requirements. Most of his work is published in non-mainstream journals that are not peer-reviewed. We don't want them checked too closely do we, or they would be found to be meandering, mistaken, and misstated.
The facts he doesn't twist, he completely misstates. Put it this way. Don't ever quote one of his books or essays without double checking the facts elsewhere.
James
A.S., B.S., M.B.A.
A.S., B.S., M.B.A.