![]() |
|
Huh? - Printable Version +- DL Truth: Distance Learning Truth (https://www.dltruth.com) +-- Forum: DL Hall of Shame: Individuals (https://www.dltruth.com/forum-7.html) +--- Forum: Gus Sainz (https://www.dltruth.com/forum-14.html) +--- Thread: Huh? (/thread-88.html) |
Huh? - Whatever - 09-02-2007 The DD gang seems to get more paranoid all the time. Why is Gus threatening to boot BRB? Does it mean Be Right Back? "Stalking"??? Oh, brother... RE: Huh? - Randall Flagg - 09-03-2007 You must agree that "RA is the Only Way" and that "Gus is always right" if you don't agree with these, it's Big-Boot-Time. RE: Huh? - DR ANATIDAE - 09-03-2007 Whatever Wrote:The DD gang seems to get more paranoid all the time. Why is Gus threatening to boot BRB? Does it mean Be Right Back? "Stalking"??? Oh, brother... JB, PUFFMAN, INSAINZ, G-G, RCD, 4WD, Jack the Ripper, and a few other DD/DI misfits have spent much of their miserable lives 'stalking' and 'outing' perfectly innocent people - contacting employers, contacting universities, contacting news media, contacting a variety of educational establishments, etc. What thrills they get out of such activity is hard to imagine. RE: Huh? - Ben Johnson - 09-04-2007 Whatever Wrote:The DD gang seems to get more paranoid all the time. Why is Gus threatening to boot BRB? Does it mean Be Right Back? "Stalking"??? Oh, brother... BRB is believed to be a former policeman who works for Steve & Dixie Randock's lawyer. Their trial is supposed to be this fall. He's just telling Gus that he has read and recorded what was said and is leaving an identifier. I am not sure that would be called stalking. RE: Huh? - Whatever - 09-04-2007 Ben Johnson Wrote:Whatever Wrote:The DD gang seems to get more paranoid all the time. Why is Gus threatening to boot BRB? Does it mean Be Right Back? "Stalking"??? Oh, brother... Is this one of them? Peter S. Schweda Waldo, Schweda & Montgomery, P.S. 2206 North ... evidence due to outrageous government misconduct which violate the .... Outrageous government misconduct started with leaving the phony note about RE: Huh? - Ben Johnson - 09-04-2007 So they had a warrant for specific items and then went way beyond it. I suspect that if they never had a warrant to start with maybe they could have used trickery but obtaining a warrant formalizes the process and they must be bound by its terms. They SS obviously showed nothing but contempt for the judge issuing the warrant. They must think he/she is a moron. RE: Huh? - Whatever - 09-04-2007 Ben Johnson Wrote:So they had a warrant for specific items and then went way beyond it. I suspect that if they never had a warrant to start with maybe they could have used trickery but obtaining a warrant formalizes the process and they must be bound by its terms. They SS obviously showed nothing but contempt for the judge issuing the warrant. They must think he/she is a moron. Might have to make a trip the the Northwest to watch this one :-) |