![]() |
|
Gollin Hiding UIUC Connection? - Printable Version +- DL Truth: Distance Learning Truth (https://www.dltruth.com) +-- Forum: DL Hall of Shame: Individuals (https://www.dltruth.com/forum-7.html) +--- Forum: George Gollin (https://www.dltruth.com/forum-18.html) +--- Thread: Gollin Hiding UIUC Connection? (/thread-830.html) |
Gollin Hiding UIUC Connection? - Winston Smith - 05-07-2010 Now that he has brought down a potential $120 million federal lawsuit on his employer, is George Gollin (George D. Gollin, George Dana Gollin) downplaying his connection to the U. of I.? Or as our esteemed colleague Little Arminius might have phrased it, tension between Gollin and UIUC? Here’s a news story about a guy who got aced out for a soft government job by a loser named Rufus Walden with a Rochville “degree.” The guy did the ten seconds worth of internet research to determine that Rochville has no academic credibility, but apparently the government dimwits doing the hiring did not. So far so good, but then the guy had to go try to find an “expert,” and when he couldn’t find one he settled for dumbass butt-scratcher Gollin. Notice how the article describes him, not as usually occurs, “University of Illinois physics professor,” but rather as “with the Council of Higher Education Accreditation.” Did somebody at U of I tell Gollin to stop dragging the university into his sleazy little hobby? Or did Dr. Dumbass decide he should spread around the blame a little better so that there are more deep pockets for plantiffs to get paid from when they sue him? The funny thing about this story is that over on the left there is a link to the Rochville student transcript that was obtained through an FOIA request. Notice that Rufus barely eked out a C+ in his Business Ethics class. Think Rochville was trying to tell us something? Former Water Dept. Worker Questions Employee Screening Process Quote: Posted: 11:48 am EDT May 5, 2010 RE: Gollin Hiding UIUC Connection? - WilliamW - 05-08-2010 wsbtv Wrote:He said the job posting read that one qualification was a bachelor's degree that has to be from a properly accredited institution. Assuming the statement about the job posting is correct, and that by "properly accredited" they mean accredited by a government-recognized agency, it seems like an easy call that Rochville didn't make the grade. Not because it was a "diploma mill," but simply because it was not properly accredited. So why go the extra step and call them a "diploma mill"? Another instance of George Gollin not answering the simple question, but instead going out of his way to gratuitously slam an unaccredited school. If the employer failed to follow its own policies, either through ineptitude or chicanery, how is that Rochville's problem? It sounds like it's the government agency's problem (and Atlanta taxpayers'). Where is George Gollin's comment on the corrupt or incompetent Atlanta Watershed Department? Not a word, of course, because the physics genius isn't capable of analyzing the situation properly or apportioning blame appropriately. Just a shrill, knee-jerk spew of "diploma mill!" like a squawking parrot that only knows one answer. Which is why he's spending his spare time talking to slander lawsuit defense lawyers. |