![]() |
|
Forbes: Best/Worst-Educated US Cities - Printable Version +- DL Truth: Distance Learning Truth (https://www.dltruth.com) +-- Forum: Discussion (https://www.dltruth.com/forum-6.html) +--- Forum: General Education Discussions (https://www.dltruth.com/forum-10.html) +--- Thread: Forbes: Best/Worst-Educated US Cities (/thread-461.html) |
Forbes: Best/Worst-Educated US Cities - Don Dresden - 11-26-2008 Quote:America's Best- And Worst-Educated Cities BEST No. 1 Boulder, Colo. No. 2 Ann Arbor, Mich. No. 3 Washington, D.C. No. 4 San Jose, Calif No. 5 San Francisco, Calif No. 6 Southern Connecticut No. 7 Charlottesville, Va. No. 8 Durham, N.C. No. 9 Boston, Mass. No. 10 Fort Collins, Colo WORST No. 1 Lake Havasu, Ariz No. 2 Vineland, N.J. No. 3 Merced, Calif. No. 4 Visalia, Calif No. 5 Houma, La. No. 6 Yuma, Ariz. No. 7 Bakersfield, Calif. No. 8 Ottawa, Ill. No. 9 Fort Smith, Ark. No. 10 McAllen, Texas RE: Forbes: Best/Worst-Educated US Cities - Dennis Ruhl - 11-26-2008 My home turf of Alberta has a labor shortage and high wages yet has the lowest participation rate for post-secondary education in Canada. A kid can quit school and and make $20 an hour at a low paying job or $30 if he's lucky and end up working 12 hour days for weeks on end, most of it overtime. I always wonder whether relating education to compensation is a meaningful measurement. Are we sure the correct correlation isn't smart people to compensation. |