Brian?Crawford Wrote:

The?Effer Wrote:Being stalked by a psychotic, obsessive mental case? Like to know more about him than he does about you, for your own protection and that of your family?

George Gollin (George D. Gollin, George Dana Gollin)
813 W University Ave
Champaign IL 61820-3921
(217) 398-3360

SSN: xxx-xx-2934
DOB: 05/06/1953
Illinois Driver's License: G45030453130

Melanie Jane Loots
SSN: xxx-xx-3309
DOB: 10/15/1953

Motor Vehicles Registered:
1993 Saturn SL1--Sedan 4 Door
VIN: 1G8ZG5590PZ196464
Title Number: H7142557

1999 Volvo S70
VIN: YV1LS55A9X2615600
Title Number: T9277877010

Miles Wrote:FYI, The primary mission of the sniper team is to eliminate selected enemy targets with long-range precision fire. How well the sniper accomplishes his mission depends on knowledge, understanding and application of various field techniques that allow him to move, hide, observe, and detect targets, and in some instances, to avoid being eaten by the Royal Tiger!

Fort?Bragg Wrote:A 1993 Saturn 4 door? How do I know that the Saturn has to be George's car? Life on the edge, hey George.

ham Wrote:

Fort?Bragg Wrote:A 1993 Saturn 4 door? How do I know that the Saturn has to be George's car? Life on the edge, hey George.

gay teen porn DVDs are better business...

Quote:October 03, 2007

Newspaper's Publishing Of Plaintiff's Social Security Number Did Not Violate His Privacy Or Civil Rights

An interesting little case from the Fourth Department last week should give all pause to consider the power of the press to publish almost any personal information - Valeriano v Rome Sentinel Co., 2007 NY Slip Op 07163.

In that case, the plaintiff was involved in an illegal sports gambling operation. In publishing a story about the operation, the defendant's daily newspaper published the plaintiff's name, address, date of birth, and his Social Security number along with information concerning 12 other individuals involved. The plaintiff brought an action asserting causes of action under Civil Rights Law ? 50 and for negligence. The Supreme Court found that the complaint failed to state a cause of action and the Fourth Department agreed.

Civil Rights Law ? 50 provides:

A person, firm or corporation that uses for advertising purposes, or for the purposes of trade, the name, portrait or picture of any living person without having first obtained the written consent of such person, or if a minor of his or her parent or guardian, is guilty of a misdemeanor.

The Fourth Department stated that the newspaper article did not violate ? 50 because the information was published by the defendant in a "newsworthy article" and was not used for advertising or trade purposes. In addition, the Court stated that the complaint did not state a valid cause of action for negligence because the defendant was not a government or private entity with a statutory, contractual or fiduciary duty to protect the confidentiality of plaintiff's personal information. Thus, the plaintiff's "negligence" cause of action was in reality the functional equivalent of a common-law privacy tort, which the Court stated New York did not recognize.