+- DL Truth: Distance Learning Truth (https://www.dltruth.com)
+-- Forum: Discussion (https://www.dltruth.com/forum-6.html)
+--- Forum: Unaccredited vs. State-Approved vs. Accredited (https://www.dltruth.com/forum-9.html)
+--- Thread: 3 Years for Dixie (/thread-301.html)
RE: 3 Years for Dixie - Herbert Spencer - 07-06-2008
This worked for Scooter Libby (convicted June 22, 2007, clemency July 2, 2007):
RULES GOVERNING PETITIONS FOR EXECUTIVE CLEMENCY
RE: 3 Years for Dixie - Dennis Ruhl - 07-07-2008
Don't count on clemency. It takes political connections and the Randocks don't have any. Now if they would have slipped a few hundred grand in bribes, sorry I meant political donations, does anyone think they wouldn't be walking free?
RE: 3 Years for Dixie - Armando Ramos - 07-08-2008
Herbert?Spencer Wrote:1. the government contriving to run you out of business by
?a. confounding your foreign accreditation,
?b. bringing fraud charges against you because you don't have foreign accreditation, and
?c. trying you before a judge who sits on the board of trustees of one of your competitors, or
That's like a traffic cop tearing up your driver's license then writing you a ticket for driving without a license.
Even Bruce the Union Goon Horse Cop wouldn't try that. It wouldn't fly in any traffic court on the planet, but for "some reason" it flies in the federal court? Rigged game, no doubt about it.
Dennis?Ruhl Wrote:Now if they would have slipped a few hundred grand in bribes, sorry I meant political donations, does anyone think they wouldn't be walking free?
More proof these are not the criminal masterminds they are made out to be on other channels. Real pros would have paid off their local congressman and any other pol with a hand out to keep the US State Department out of the Liberian accreditation business.