[Deleted]
#11
True Patriot Wrote:I totally denounce the likes of Uncle Janko for blaming me for the subject of this thread. My friends know I would never make such judgments based on race or ethnic creed. Uncle Janko has stooped to a new low in trying to cause strife among the members of DLTruth. I would suggest that we don't entertain him anymore, and close this thread once and for all.

http://www.degreediscussion.com/forums/v...1&start=15

Sincerely,

Dr. Robert Ray Hill

No one thought it was you, not even them.
It was just a little game they were playing to aggravate you. After so many years of this I can hardly get excited over anything they say or do. It's all mind games and word jousts.

We should feel sorry for them. If it wasn't for their mothers they wouldn't even have a sex life. Rolleyes
James
A.S., B.S., M.B.A.
Reply
#12
Uncle Janko is a clown.
He'll throw racist slurs to anyone, but when heat comes closer to home, he'll reel & moan "owww owww owww hummoun boeing" and finger point nazis or other hallucinations he has after spending too much time on Thomas Chip White's gay teen porn sites ( now THAT is ethics ) or trying to "put in the right perspective" questionable DE/DL pursuits by John Bear, George Brown etc, which they call "degree mills" themselves these days...

Why africans might be the pets of some political parties or groups with vested interests, instead of latinos or native americans indians AS A GROUP, it's easy to guess...
1 when latinos will be a majority, they are likely to secede or provoke some major global change. Some areas are affected already. Mexico and Cuba are ready to back them up.

2 Indians have ancient customs, pride and whatever.

3 Africans have Spike Lee, MTV, rap, basket, drooling over white women, third rate resentment speeches easily swapped with those of feminists, queers, animal rights activists, vegans etc...AND scared to hell when one mentions the word "Africa" (the real one from news, not some fictionalized account of a mythical past ). So big brother can do with them AS A GROUP (because there will be some of them seeing through this or above all this ) whatever it wants, for they need it for support and self-esteem.

4 Ask a latino today and he'll say that California (or whatever ) should be a mexican province TODAY; not some fictionalized Mexico from a fabricated bestseller. Ask an indian today (again, the "self-aware", activist, stand-up-for-your-rights person ) and he'll probably ask for indian rule and respect for his tribe's ancient customs. Can you ever picture an African saying that they wish Harlem were a province of Uganda? What "ancient customs", what "tribe"?
A.A Mole University
B.A London Institute of Applied Research
B.Sc Millard Fillmore
M.A International Institute for Advanced Studies
Ph.D London Institute of Applied Research
Ph.D Millard Fillmore
Reply
#13
The Unitd States has the right, in fact the responsibility to defend its borders from invasion. The importation of very cheap labor drives down wages here and invites more illegal entry. All of South America does not have the right to move here. Try entering and living in Mexico minus legal documents. You won't like the results.

People do act, obviously, as groups for what they see as their own interests. It is natural and necessary for others to act in groups to oppose those interests when they are in conflict with the norms and standards that are necessary for a orderly successful society.

When people act as individuals they can be treated as individuals. When they act in groups they must be treated as groups. I see nothing wrong with the United States defending its borders against illegal entry and against cheap, dangerous, products. Even against those willing to work for very low wages, which in turn hurts Americans by driving down wages to the point where the wage itself is unlivable.

My view. Consider people as individuals until they start acting in groups, then you treat them as groups. You treat people as they are and as they behave, not for their color or religion.
James
A.S., B.S., M.B.A.
Reply
#14
Just so we know...
from the horse's mouth...
BLACK CRIME STATISTICS...USA dept. of justice.

Quote:At the end of 2001, about 16.6 percent of adult black males were
current or former inmates, compared to 7.7 percent of Hispanic males
and 2.6 percent of white males. Among black males 35 to 44 years of
age, 22 percent were current or former prisoners, compared to 10 percent
of Hispanic males and 3.5 percent of white males in the same age group.

Jamal, Rufus and Leroy can -of course!- moan that is all a conspiracy, with a retinue of queer, communist and lib-lab scholars. Lucky they were enslaved 400 years ago...if they practiced theft, murder, robbery, rape & other passtimes back in the mother Africa, you'd see plenty of Jamals and Leroys without feet, hands or barely hanging from a pole.


Attached Files
.pdf   Bureau of Justice Statistics Press Release_ Prevalence of Imp.pdf (Size: 15.66 KB / Downloads: 2)
A.A Mole University
B.A London Institute of Applied Research
B.Sc Millard Fillmore
M.A International Institute for Advanced Studies
Ph.D London Institute of Applied Research
Ph.D Millard Fillmore
Reply
#15
Can't the administrator delete this disgusting thread?
Reply
#16
i agree: the figures in the department of justice statistics are disgusting.
A.A Mole University
B.A London Institute of Applied Research
B.Sc Millard Fillmore
M.A International Institute for Advanced Studies
Ph.D London Institute of Applied Research
Ph.D Millard Fillmore
Reply
#17
True Patriot Wrote:I totally denounce...

Dr. Robert Ray Hill

Please lay off the gay bashing. You're gay, that's why you told your family you were going to Iraq to sell Hershey bars to soldiers when you weren't really there. It is not fair of you to lead a double life and bash other homosexuals.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)