06-28-2009, 03:24 PM
According to Shawn A (also known as Capella Rocks elsewhere) at ToelickerInfo :
It's a shame that the guys for whom these programs were intended--those with real life learning experience (e.g., military, police, fire, etc.), who aren't looking for easy units for queering off or playing "Mary Had A Little Lamb" on their guitar--are going to suffer as a result of the abuse of the system by exploitative non-achievers like Levicoff or Sainz.
But it's about time the accreditation agencies woke up to the fact that the 110-Day Wonders of the World are making a mockery of the process. People in the real world know that the magic wand of accreditation does not mitigate against horse crap.
This is a step in right direction, toward accreditation actually equalling some sort of objective quality standard and not just government approved millism.
Quote:My daughter received a letter from Charter Oak admissions today. Effective July 1, 2009 - all new Charter Oak Students must take a 3 credit capstone course.
For out of state students - this adds $795 to the cost of the degree; and of course, you can't transfer in the entire degree now.
According to the letter, Charter Oak is incorporating this change:
"This is our way of ensuring that your degree aligns with the learning outcomes and standards established by our College and sanctioned by our accrediting agency, The New England Association of Schools and Colleges."
Shawn
Quote:Don't be surprised - but I believe that Excelsior and TESC will have a similar requirement also.http://forums.degreeinfo.com/showthread....ab&t=31263
The RA's are focusing on Program Outcomes and measurement - "Can your graduates do what you say they can?" Without some type of capstone course, the school can't demonstrate this for someone who transfers most or all of their credits in.
Shawn
It's a shame that the guys for whom these programs were intended--those with real life learning experience (e.g., military, police, fire, etc.), who aren't looking for easy units for queering off or playing "Mary Had A Little Lamb" on their guitar--are going to suffer as a result of the abuse of the system by exploitative non-achievers like Levicoff or Sainz.
But it's about time the accreditation agencies woke up to the fact that the 110-Day Wonders of the World are making a mockery of the process. People in the real world know that the magic wand of accreditation does not mitigate against horse crap.
This is a step in right direction, toward accreditation actually equalling some sort of objective quality standard and not just government approved millism.