My Favourite Funny Uncle
#1
From Degreediscussion:

""""Report this postReply with quote Re: Info on PyD at Cal Coast
by uncle janko on Thu Oct 09, 2008 7:18 pm

Wow. The echoes of "but it's leeegal" are deafening here in the cavern of arcana. Since no one cares to engage questions of ethics and transparency beyond the matter of how one decorates one's office wall and a certain scapegrace legal positivism  , may I offer another question once again: what is the allure of CCU?
(I have no animus against CCU, despite some posters' comment to that effect.)
CCU has held a mesmeric fascination for years. Why is this?

Who are its leading professors under whom it brings academic challenge and professional/practical cachet to have studied? What are the journal articles in refereed journals which have brought lustre to CCU itself? What are the inter-university links and programmes by which CCU is integrated into the wider field of graduate studies in psychology--or other fields, for that matter? Who are the major theoreticians in psychology and its practice whose ideas and theories distinctively shape the approach of CCU's psychology department? Where have master's graduates gone on to seek doctorates in this period between CCU's accreditation and its future authorisation, should it come, to offer doctorates itself?

These are the sorts of questions, eminently non-rhetorical, which anyone seriously interested in graduate study at any institution ought to be asking, mutatis mutandis. What answers have those of you interested in studying psychology on the doctoral level at CCU found?"""""

http://www.degreediscussion.com/forums/v...&start=135

It's a non-dissertation PsyD they are talking about.  Isn't that something like auto mechanics for the brain.  Isn't the point of a PsyD. professional practice as opposed to research.  I'm sure CCU's research standards will meet those pioneered by the U of Phoenix, DeVry, etc. etc. etc.

CCU certainly didn't invent the non-dissertation PsyD and they're not going to be the last to offer it.  I haven't checked recently but CCU has had pretty well educated faculty.

I love moralists discussing ethics.  Ethicists discussing morals?  Maybe the immorality is the closing of the core of the psychology profession to those with very selective qualifications while leaving the gruntwork to similarly educated people labeled as social workers, family counsellors etc.  I love professions to be reasonably open.  Any undermining of groups such as the APA and ABA is good.  They serve themselves and not the public.  By creating artificial shortages of their skills they drive up their income and prestige to the detriment of the people.  If you want a moral issue to fight, chew on that one.
Reply
#2
Quote:questions of ethics and transparency

Like the gay teen porn funded degreeinfo and the gay teen pornographer turned education authority?
When did the online fleabags answer THOSE questions?
Then you get I.C.H.M, Millard Fillmore, L.I.A.R... $40.000 spent on one individual hooker...
A.A Mole University
B.A London Institute of Applied Research
B.Sc Millard Fillmore
M.A International Institute for Advanced Studies
Ph.D London Institute of Applied Research
Ph.D Millard Fillmore
Reply
#3
More Janko:

(quote)Here is the simplified version of my questions.

Who are the leading CCU professors now?
What articles have they published in refereed journals by now?
What are inter-university links for CCU now?
What major theoreticians now shape CCU's view of psychology and its practice?
Where have graduates of CCU gone for further study as of now?

I asked for replies from those interested in possible future doc study at CCU, NOT from those currently engaged in it (since it does not yet exist) NOR that anybody should describe what goes on in what does not yet exist.

Can these questions not be answered about Cal Coast as it is? If their wording needs to be refined to fit the specific field of psychology, go ahead. I assume that others have more expertise in the field of psychology than I.(quote)

Our boy doesn't get it. I went to a very good university and out of 20-30 different profs, I think I had one who left a mark in his field. The rest were just another beet in the borscht, published a lot of blah blah crap some of it even ridiculous. When the day comes when governments and foundations start passing out research grants to for-profit schools, I'm sure CCU will take a lead. How many research positions are funded by schools themselves? Very damn few. Janko is a moron, isn't he.
Reply
#4
The monster thread at DD continues. I guess a lot of people have had a good experience at CCU and have faith that CCU, while being reasonably rigorous, sets up their programs for student success not failure.

CCU has always been a student friendly school and its reputation precedes it. I think CCU has always built itself as having programs catering to people already advanced in their careers. At one time the average age of their students was about 40. They used to turn down students without many years of experience.

Their focus has now changed and they no longer have a requirement of years of experience in the field of study. I hope they have continued the student friendliness as I know it.
Reply
#5
There was a time when CCU was a diploma mill.

There was a time when CCU was an innovative, but unaccredited, distance university; a real leader in its field.

There was a time when CCU was a run-of-the-mill unaccredited distance university.

And there is a time when CCU is a run-of-the-mill accredited university, recognized by a second-rate (yet legitimate) accrediting agency. That time is now.
Reply
#6
Duggle Wrote:There was a time when CCU was a diploma mill.

There was a time when CCU was an innovative, but unaccredited, distance university; a real leader in its field.

There was a time when CCU was a run-of-the-mill unaccredited distance university.

And there is a time when CCU is a run-of-the-mill accredited university, recognized by a second-rate (yet legitimate) accrediting agency.  That time is now.

I don't know that CCU would have ever been determined to be a diploma mill. It is definitely a second rate accredited university. Actually it would be 4th, maybe actually 5th tier if such a thing existed. It serves the need of a particular group of students and does it very well. It has lots of company, competing with schools such as Phoenix, Devry, Northcentral etc. I am proud to be a CCU graduate and student.

I am always concerned with put-downs of DETC. There is no apparent indication of them being a lesser accreditor. DETC regulations are more stringent than most regional accreditors and this was acknowledged by the US Dept of Education during their last approval to operate. But what does the USDOE know?
Reply
#7
I see Janko has Jimmy, his House Whigger, doing his chores looking up info on CCU. The big question is does he do windows? And when you're done Jimmy, check out the U of Phoenix and enlighten us on all the research going on there.
Reply
#8
Fort Bragg Wrote:I see Janko has Jimmy, his House Whigger, doing his chores looking up info on CCU.  The big question is does he do windows?  And when you're done Jimmy, check out the U of Phoenix and enlighten us on all the research going on there.
JACKASS!
Reply
#9
Richard Kimble Wrote:
JACKASS!

Too bad Jimmy the Whigger doesn't show the same huevos at DD that Richard Kimble shows here.  Could it be that Richard understands that this website appreciates free exchange of ideas, while that other one doesn't?
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)