D00bie Wrote:Probably they were near dead anyways. But Robert Hill posted the end of the line for Sorbon. Anyone still defending this sham is beyond hope.
The damning evidence is located on DegreeBored:
http://forums.degreeboard.com/showthread...98&page=10
It's good news that the Rev. Dr. R.R. Hill has seen the light. That sort of research effort is outstanding. It's just a shame he didn't take the trouble
before he dropped $500 on a useless degree.
That's an expensive bit of research, although I hear there's people who spent $40,000 researching a book on hookers, so it could have been worse.
Since I am pretty much beyond hope, I will defend the sham to some extent by raising these points.
The email from Jean Tapie, Rectorat de l'académie de Poitiers, states that "Sorbon is not a legal private establishment in France. It is not recognized by the ministry for national education."
The Sorbon website states that Sorbon
Quote:...is registered by the French Government under # 0862003720 and published at the Journal officiel of the French Republic (# 1669 of # 39 - 136º année)....It has a SIRET and SIREN number and is tax (VAT) exempt as an "Etablissement d'Enseignement Supérieur privé sans but lucratif". It is a not for profit organization.
If, as the Sorbon website states, Sorbon is a duly established French non-profit organziation, then Tapie's statement that it is "not a legal private establishment in France" could be incorrect. So the first point seems like it should be fairly easy to verifiy. And if Sorbon indeed is registered and numbered as claimed, this reflects negatively on the credibility of Tapie.
The next sentence, that Sorbon is not recognized by the ministry for national education, seems ambiguous. As we know, in Denmark, for example, a school does not need to be approved by the government to grant degrees. In such places "recognition," whatever that might entail, is necessary only if the school is taking government money. Tapie didn't say that Sorbon is, for example, "illegal" or in any way acting contrary to French law, only that it wasn't recognized by the French government. So some clarification of that point seems necessary before it can be taken as a "coffin nail."
Also, what I found most disturbing about this, is the statement by Jean-Marie Lebon, Educationalist, that
Quote:A small search on google, ask, yahoo, etc, brings you several US official documents listing this "school" as bogus. Please find three of these documents here.
Perhaps some of that got lost in the translation, and I didn't see the three documents referred to. But the gist of it seemed to be that, of course it's bogus, because it's on Oregon's list of bogus schools. The French apparently have surrendered their sovereignty to Gay Al.
Quote:All the "degrees" delivered by "University Robert de Sorbon" are totally useless. They have names - really funny - to escape the French law.
So all it takes is a funny name to escape French law? No wonder the Schutzstaffel had such success. Looking at the Sorbon
degree list, I didn't see anything "funny" about their names. To what exactly is this person referring?
I'm not saying Sorbon isn't all that and more, just that the French don't seem to be able to articulate it with the degree of precision one would expect from government agencies, even French government agencies. If it really is a mill you wouldn't think they would have such a hard time saying so. Is there, for example, a
French government website that says they are bogus? Is there a French Minister of Funny Names that says its degrees are bogus? If that's a coffin nail I see why Jim Morrison got buried in France.