07-01-2015, 06:07 AM
For years John Bear and the gang screamed accredited-accredited-accredited. Then, guess what? That's not good enough. It has to be RA. Ok, then it became any RA degree/school will do. They are all the same, just so it's RA. But as we all know it's not the same. Does anyone seriously believe that Harvard, MIT, Princeton, Yale, means the same as UOP/and others of the same gender. Take the lesser level RA schools and try to get hired as a professor at the Big Boys party.
Obviously the reason they say RA is RA is because they got degrees that were easier/cheaper/quicker. The very things they accuse others of. Bottom feeder RA schools compete with the DEAC and other national accreditors. My belief is that for pure learning, the DEAC schools are better. Are they accepted better than the bottom crust of the RA's ? I don't know. I doubt it. I can just imagine applying for a position at any of the large state run colleges with all RA bottom feeders. But as Bear would say, If it's RA that's all that matters. That's not what many are saying about UOP/TESC/NC, and others like them. They seem to think they have been sold a bag of CRAP. Could be. My thoughts would run along these lines. RA, at the bottom end is usable if you have other things to bring to the table, experience-skills-smarts-willingness to move about. The same skills that make DEAC schools usable.
I have three DEAC/NHCS accredited degrees and two unaccredited degrees. According to the gang I'm one of the untouchables, and yet I have lived worked and my life has been just fine. Not one employer ever challenged any of my listed schools. I once got an accredited school to accept my unaccredited credits into their program. That according to the gang can't be done, but I did it. Many others have done much the same. The gang repeats what they want to be true, wish to be true, pray to be true. In reality, they, like Bear, don't know. They never tried doing what they (THINK ) can't be done. Many things can be done if you try.
Obviously the reason they say RA is RA is because they got degrees that were easier/cheaper/quicker. The very things they accuse others of. Bottom feeder RA schools compete with the DEAC and other national accreditors. My belief is that for pure learning, the DEAC schools are better. Are they accepted better than the bottom crust of the RA's ? I don't know. I doubt it. I can just imagine applying for a position at any of the large state run colleges with all RA bottom feeders. But as Bear would say, If it's RA that's all that matters. That's not what many are saying about UOP/TESC/NC, and others like them. They seem to think they have been sold a bag of CRAP. Could be. My thoughts would run along these lines. RA, at the bottom end is usable if you have other things to bring to the table, experience-skills-smarts-willingness to move about. The same skills that make DEAC schools usable.
I have three DEAC/NHCS accredited degrees and two unaccredited degrees. According to the gang I'm one of the untouchables, and yet I have lived worked and my life has been just fine. Not one employer ever challenged any of my listed schools. I once got an accredited school to accept my unaccredited credits into their program. That according to the gang can't be done, but I did it. Many others have done much the same. The gang repeats what they want to be true, wish to be true, pray to be true. In reality, they, like Bear, don't know. They never tried doing what they (THINK ) can't be done. Many things can be done if you try.