![]() |
|
Charisma Sues RCD, DD, DI - Printable Version +- DL Truth: Distance Learning Truth (https://www.dltruth.com) +-- Forum: Discussion (https://www.dltruth.com/forum-6.html) +--- Forum: Distance Learning Discussion (https://www.dltruth.com/forum-8.html) +--- Thread: Charisma Sues RCD, DD, DI (/thread-1794.html) |
RE: Charisma Sues RCD, DD, DI - D00bie - 01-26-2015 (01-25-2015, 08:19 AM)Albert Hidel Wrote:(09-28-2014, 01:03 PM)Don Dresden Wrote: Even Doogle wouldn't be dumb enough to sign for a registered letter....would he? Can't be him. The person described is 5'8". That's about 12 inches too tall. RE: Charisma Sues RCD, DD, DI - Armando Ramos - 01-26-2015 (01-26-2015, 02:34 PM)D00bie Wrote: Can't be him. The person described is 5'8". That's about 12 inches too tall. ![]() Richie found his shoes! RE: Charisma Sues RCD, DD, DI - Howie Felterbush - 01-29-2015 (01-25-2015, 08:19 AM)Albert Hidel Wrote: The lurid details, courtesy of the Proof of Service filed by Charisma: So if Doogle Arse got served on 1/15/2015 he's got 30 days to file a response. Which means if Charisma is on top of this they should be down to the courthouse right about 2/17/2015 to take his default (30 days from 1/15 is 2/14, a Saturday, so Doogle would have until the following Monday). Did Doogle do like notorious John Bear did when he got sued by O'Block and run to Gus for free advice? ("What are 'we' going to do, Gus?!?") Or did he just crap his pants and crawl whimpering into a corner? RE: Charisma Sues RCD, DD, DI - JohnBear - 01-31-2015 Mr. Hidel: "Did Doogle do like notorious John Bear did when he got sued by O'Block and run to Gus for free advice?" Notorious John Bear: Well actually I went to an attorney. The matter was resolved in a few days, without cost to me. RE: Charisma Sues RCD, DD, DI - Albert Hidel - 01-31-2015 (01-31-2015, 01:53 AM)JohnBear Wrote: Mr. Hidel: "Did Doogle do like notorious John Bear did when he got sued by O'Block and run to Gus for free advice?" Bear + Truth = Fail
RE: Charisma Sues RCD, DD, DI - Herbert Spencer - 02-17-2015 (01-29-2015, 11:42 AM)Howie Felterbush Wrote: So if Doogle Arse got served on 1/15/2015 he's got 30 days to file a response. Which means if Charisma is on top of this they should be down to the courthouse right about 2/17/2015 to take his default (30 days from 1/15 is 2/14, a Saturday, so Doogle would have until the following Monday). Monday 2/16 is a holiday for California courts, so you need to tack another day onto that. Doogle has until Tuesday 2/17 to file a responsive pleading, so they can take his default 2/18 if he hasn't appeared. Check those People's Republic of Kalifornia court holidays. All three of MLK, Lincoln and "President's," no day off for Good Friday but a day off for Cesar Shave Ass. No time off for May Day or Ramadan yet? RE: Charisma Sues RCD, DD, DI - Armando Ramos - 02-20-2015 Doogle files a timely Demurrer.
DouglasDemurrer01.pdf (Size: 1.17 MB / Downloads: 25)
Interesting that Doogle didn't just have John Bear's magic lawyer call Charisma's lawyer and get the whole thing "resolved in a few days, without cost." ![]() Typically in defamation actions the only real issue isn't whether the Demurrer will be granted, but rather whether it will be granted with or without leave to amend. Some judges give plaintiffs a couple bites at the apple just as a matter of policy. Since this is first demurrer, my prediction is that it will be granted on all counts with leave to amend. Eventually I'd expect a second demurrer to be granted without leave on the two defamation counts. I'd like to see what Charisma comes up with in defense of its two business interference counts. If, as Doogle argues, the only "independently wrongful act" alleged is constitutionally protected free speech then those counts must fall as well. But a judge might see that the complaint could be amended to allege such additional facts, and probably will give Charisma more than two bites to do that. RE: Charisma Sues RCD, DD, DI - Ben Johnson - 02-21-2015 Looks like the lawyer cost Doogle some serious coin. Seems pretty talented for a girl. RE: Charisma Sues RCD, DD, DI - Don Dresden - 02-21-2015 (02-21-2015, 06:01 AM)Ben Johnson Wrote: Looks like the lawyer cost Doogle some serious coin. Seems pretty talented for a girl. Probably yes to the first part, not so sure about the second. If Doogle Arse had turned this over to an insurance company they would have hired a big insurance defense firm with a bunch of names on the letterhead and not some gal sole practitioner out almost to San Bernardino County. So he probably is paying for it himself. Perhaps homeowners' policies in Virginia aren't as comprehensive as those in other regions. Or perhaps insurance companies in Virginia aren't as afraid of bad faith lawsuits as those in other regions. Or perhaps Doogle just had some other important reason for footing the bill himself. Maybe he's afraid his wife will find out if he makes a claim on their insurance. "I told you to stop wasting all your damn time on those stupid discussion boards, but noooooooo, Double Doctor Dumbass is just too smart to listen to his wife..." One reason Bear seems to have little difficulty talking his way out of these little problems is that, since he has no principles, he has nothing to compromise. He is quite willing to take a step back now, because he knows he can just lie, er, I mean, try to spin it into something positive and take two steps forward down the road. Bear is agreeable to expunging any of his idle public pronouncements that people take issue with because he better than anyone knows they are completely meaningless and subject to change without notice anyway. He also knows that probably only about six other people even read them in the first place. Doogle, on the other hand, is dumb enough to go down with the ship just so Levicoff won't call him a pussy. As to this lady lawyer's skills, I note that an LA County judge excoriated her for trying to "repeal the First Amendment." Even the tabloids mocked her as a "legal eagle." Is that really the lawyer you want defending you on First Amendment grounds? Quote:Jeremy London's Restraining Order Against Family Denied Lombardo's attorney profile shows "75% Criminal Defense, 25% Family." The math therefore would seem to suggest "0% civil litigation defense" experience. That demurrer is kind of all over the place, which makes you wonder if maybe she just cut-and-pasted pieces from all the demurrers she has gotten from the people she has unsuccessfully sued. ![]() Catherine Rose Lombardo Lawyer Babe for the Defendant Shoeless Rich Douglas RE: Charisma Sues RCD, DD, DI - Dickie Billericay - 02-21-2015 Was she sitting on the bowl when they took that picture? Seems appropriate. ![]()
|