Can somebody give Prof. T. J. Joseph a hand? And part of an arm? As we all know, Islam is really a "religion of peace," and we infidels just don't understand it. And when they got done sweeping up all the pieces he still got fired.
Hey, Popular Front of India, screw you and double screw that diaper-headed fag Muhammad! If you don't like it you can take it up with my friend, Prof. George Gollin at the University of Illinois. He knows how to handle camel humping scum like you.
Quote:Muslims sever university professor's hand for offending Islam
A union at Mahatma University wants Catholic-run Newman College to re-hire professor who lost his job because he “offended” the sentiments of the population with words deemed offensive to Muhammad. For this, unknown attackers chopped off his hand.
By Asia News
Friday, September 10, 2010
New Delhi (AsiaNews) – A Union at Mahatma University, to which the Newman College of Thodupuzha (Kerala) is affiliated, called the dismissal of Prof T.J. Joseph illegal, and demanded he be re-hired forthwith.
In a press release, the Union said, "The College failed to follow procedures in dismissing Professor Joseph. The college should rethink about his ouster”.
Prof Joseph, who headed the Department of Malayalam, had submitted an exam questionnaire to his students, but some Muslim students objected to some of the questions, claiming that they contained words offensive to Muhammad.
After he explained that he had no intention of offending, he offered his public apologies to the population, the College, Church authorities (the institution is run by Catholics) and the police department. However, on 4 July, he was attacked by activists of the Popular Front of India who chopped off a hand and part of his arm.
On 1 September, the Catholic college fired him, claiming he had offended the religious sentiments of the population, and justified its action by saying that it had to protect the secular character of the institution.
In a letter to the managing board of Newman College, Prof Joseph asked to be rehired on humanitarian grounds, explaining that he had no intention of offending. He noted that he was his family’s only breadwinner and that he had a record of 25 years without a single complaint. He added that he could not be considered a “heretic”. Despite his plea, the college turned down his request.
For his offense, Prof Joseph was jailed, but the sentence was suspended and he was released on bail.
Why should a Catholic school be worried about offending Muslims? The two religions are clearly incompatible. I don't see any Islamic colleges bending over backwards to cater to Catholicism. A Catholic school should defend its professors and its Catholic beliefs.
Anything derogatory the professor said against the Islamic culture is certainly justified, as demonstrated by their physical attack and mutilation against him. No civilized culture would do that.
Quote:Hey, Popular Front of India, screw you and double screw that diaper-headed fag Muhammad! If you don't like it you can take it up with my friend, Prof. George Gollin at the University of Illinois. He knows how to handle camel humping scum like you.
Would you say that to the ADL who 'investigates' and 'prosecutes' 'Nazis'
...or to self-proclaimed Jewish thugs who assaulted supposed 'negationists'?
Yes?
No?
On which ground?
Make it simple if you answer...I am short on methadone...
PS:it is no mystery how the withering (Catholic) Christian faith sees India as the new Aztec empire to 'civilize'. I lost count of the interviews in which glowing Catholic priest announce they are going to revolutionize India...you know...red Christs in bed with the oppressed and all that jazz you might read on a Frankfurt School handbook from 1970s East Germany...minus three pages.
If they want to bring India down the way they did us, with all the crap about oppressed pariahs and red Christs throwing the liberation gospel bomb, well...
Last: could we know which questions did he exactly ask about prophet Mohammed?
I found
it.
Quote:In April this year, Joseph was arrested after a question paper set by him triggered protests by Muslims. He was later released on bail.
The question paper, for an internal degree exam in March, contained a text taken from an article written by P T Kunjumuhammed, a director of several award-winning films and former CPI(M) legislator.
Referring to his film Garshom, Kunjumuhammed explained in the article that the thread for a scene in the movie, in which the protagonist speaks to God, was picked from his own experience about a madman who used to speak to God. While reproducing the conversation as a passage for punctuation, Joseph replaced the mad man with Muhammed, thus making it seem like a dialogue between God and Muhammed.
You mean HE submitted THAT to Muslims?
Well, It's like submitting Zundel's meditations to a Tel Aviv survivors' convention...
While it may not have worked out very well in this case, I'm not totally opposed to the concept of some accountability for university professors for their research and publications. Prof. Joseph may be the exception but too many of these clowns use their university professorships as a forum to promote their own personal cause with impunity. A hand or an arm may be a bit much for violating the policy but we could fine tune the idea to meet U.S. standards.
People in India might be willing to put up with that kind of shit. Are people in America? Unless America wakes up, hand-chopping will be the least of our problems.
Thinking about spreading a little mischief in the land, are you? When the shiarrhea hits the fan, you better think again.
Quote:Jihad to Subvert the Constitution
by Connie Hair
09/23/2010
Security experts want a new dividing line between "moderate" and "radical" Islam delineated not by violence but by a willingness to hold the U.S. Constitution as the supreme law of the land in America.
The new "Team B II report" (Shariah: The Threat to America) just out from a respected group of national security professionals details the threat America faces from Islamic shariah law, an ideology using a stealth approach called “civilization jihad” to subvert the Constitution.
The report explains the scope and breadth of an infiltration of America's government and by the Muslim Brotherhood—a worldwide jihadist entity using violent and non-violent means to force the supremacy of Islamic shariah law. Shariah is the Muslim legal-political-military doctrine.
"What we're suggesting is that the dividing line here is not terrorism. The dividing line here is shariah," Andrew C. McCarthy, former chief assistant U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York recently told HUMAN EVENTS. "Shariah is the Islamic political and legal framework. There are some in the Islamic world who want to take it the way that we take religion in the West, that is that it's a private matter that isn't imposed as an institutional, legal, political matter on the rest of society."
"There is a vast swath of the Islamic world that rejects that and takes it as a divine mission to impose shariah whether that's done by terrorism or whether it's done by more sophisticated means," said McCarthy, who successfully prosecuted Omar Abdel-Rahman the blind sheikh who first tried to blow up the World Trade Center in 1993. "Shariah is the focal point that we need to look at, and shariah is extremely important because it is antithetical in very core ways to American values, stating with the fundamental premise of the United States, which is that the governed have a right to make laws for themselves and make choices for themselves irrespective of any religious component. So that's the dividing line."
Ground Zero mosque would-be imam Feisal Abdul Rauf is a supporter of an America that is "shariah compliant."
From the report:
Key Tenets of Shariah
The following are some of the most important—and, particularly for Western non-Muslims, deeply problematic—tenets of shariah, arranged in alphabetical order. The citations (in full in the linked report, edited here for length) for these findings are drawn from the Koran, schools of Islam and other recognized sources are offered as illustrative examples of the basis for such practices under shariah.
1. Abrogation (‘Al-mansukh wa al-nasikh’ in Arabic—the abrogated and the abrogating): Verses that come later in the Koran, chronologically, supersede, or abrogate, the earlier ones. In effect, this results in the more moderate verses of the Meccan period being abrogated by the later, violent, Medinan period.
2. Adultery (‘Zina’ in Arabic): Unlawful intercourse is a capital crime under shariah, punishable by lashing and stoning to death.
3. Apostasy (‘Irtidad’ or ‘Ridda’ in Arabic): The established ruling of shariah is that apostates are to be killed wherever they may be found.
4. Democracy & Islam: Any system of man-made law is considered illicit under Islamic law, for whose adherents Allah already has provided the only law permitted, shariah. Islam and democracy can never co-exist in harmony.
5. Female Genital Mutilation.
6. Gender Inequality: Shariah explicitly relegates women to a status inferior to men.
• Testimony of a woman before a judge is worth half that of a man.
• Women are to receive just one half the inheritance of a male.
• Muslim men are given permission by Allah in the Koran to beat their wives.
• Muslim men are given permission by Allah to commit marital rape, as they please.
• Muslim men are permitted to marry up to four wives and to keep concubines in any number.
• Muslim women may marry only one Muslim man and are forbidden from marrying a non-Muslim.
• A woman may not travel outside the home without the permission of her male guardian and must be accompanied by a male family member if she does so.
• Under shariah, to bring a claim of rape, a Muslim woman must present four male Muslim witnesses in good standing. Islam thus places the burden of avoiding illicit sexual encounters entirely on the woman. In effect, under shariah, women who bring a claim of rape without being able to produce the requisite four male Muslim witnesses are admitting to having had illicit sex. If she or the man is married, this amounts to an admission of adultery.
• A Muslim woman who divorces and remarries loses custody of children from a prior marriage.
7. ‘Honor’ Killing (a.k.a. Muslim family executions): A Muslim parent faces no legal penalty under Islamic law for killing his child or grandchild.
8. Hudud Punishments: The plural of hadd, is “a fixed penalty prescribed as a right of Allah. Because hudud penalties belong to Allah, Islamic law does not permit them to be waived or commuted."
• “Shariah stipulates these punishments and methods of execution such as amputation, crucifixion, flogging, and stoning, for offenses such as adultery, homosexuality, killing without right, theft, and ‘spreading mischief in the land’ because these punishments were mandated by the Qur’an or Sunnah.” (Islamic Hudood Laws in Pakistan, Edn 1996, 5.)
9. Islamic Supremacism: belief that Islam is superior to every other culture, faith, government, and society and that it is ordained by Allah to conquer and dominate them.
10. Jew Hatred: Anti-Semitism is intrinsic to shariah and is based on the genocidal behavior of Mohammed himself in wiping out the entire Jewish population of the Arabian Peninsula.
11. Jihad: Jihad is warfare to spread Islam.
12. Lying/Taqiyya: It is permissible for a Muslim to lie, especially to non-Muslims, to safeguard himself personally or to protect Islam.
13. Slander/Blasphemy: In shariah, slander means anything that might offend a Muslim.
14. Underage Marriage: Islamic doctrine permits the marriage of pre-pubescent girls. There is no minimum age for a marriage contract and consummation may take place when the girl is age eight or nine.
15. Zakat: the obligation for Muslims to pay zakat arises out of Koran Verse 9:60 and is one of the Five Pillars of Islam. Zakat may be given only to Muslims, never to non-Muslims. What amounts to a mandatory tax is required to be given to those engaged in jihad which is among the authorized recipients.
• According to shariah, there are eight categories of recipients for Zakat: The poor; Those short of money; Zakat workers (those whose job it is to collect the zakat); Those whose hearts are to be reconciled; Those purchasing their freedom; Those in debt; Those fighting for Allah (Jihad); Travelers needing money (‘Umdat al-Salik, h8.7-h8.18)
• “It is not permissible to give Zakat to a non-Muslim.” (‘Umdat al-Salik, h8.24)
Quote:10. Jew Hatred: Anti-Semitism is intrinsic to shariah and is based on the genocidal behavior of Mohammed himself in wiping out the entire Jewish population of the Arabian Peninsula.
You little shabbat goym behave...wag your little flags and don't forget about moral naturalization...making someone else's alien interests your own...in fact: make someone else's interests supersede your own at all times...
Remember the times they called f-ckwits racists because they objected to the slimy little black-mailable lefties, whigroes and liberals someone bankrolls passing laws to flood your country with illegal aliens, of whom Muslims were a significant percentage? They said it was the only hope to get your swiss cheese pension plans going...until Madoff and others tried to help...
Well...the party line has changed...get down with the program...f-ckwits are allowed to be racists if the target is on their blacklist...remember France, Russia&China a few years back?
Oh...remember how they shred to pieces your constitution...after all, a bunch of slave-holding white supremacy kooks drafted it...remember the plight of poor Africans under that constitution? That's why they worked so diligently to subvert it during the 1960s...but right now, since it serves their purpose, you can toy with it a little.
Boy, do I love these impartial neo-cons...
Bob Dylan said everybody must get stoned. But for these peaceful Muslims it's Ladies' Day...
Quote:Video surfaces of Taliban stoning woman in northwest Pakistan
WARNING: The video above is graphic, and beyond disturbing. It is footage of a woman dying under a barrage of stones. But it must be exposed:
This is Sharia. This is an act Muhammad approved of and participated in, according to canonical Islamic sources including Sahih ("sound," "reliable") Bukhari.
This is Islam's "justice," "compassion," and "mercy" which apologists will not repudiate, attempting to dodge the issue by assuring the uninformed (and maybe even trying to make themselves believe) that it is not an issue because it is not prescribed in the Qur'an itself. Click here for why that does not make a difference to the Muslims who have continued the practice over the centuries.
And what was this woman's crime? Here is the back story. "Rare Video Shows Taliban Allegedly Stoning Woman to Death in Pakistan," by Megan Chuchmach for ABC News, September 24:
Quote:A rare video reportedly smuggled out of northwest Pakistan allegedly shows a woman being stoned to death by Taliban militants in the upper region of Orakzai.
Al Aan, a Dubai-based pan-Arab television channel that focuses on women's issues, said it had obtained cellphone footage that it says shows a woman being executed because she was seen out with a man. The killing reportedly took place two months ago and was smuggled out by a Taliban member who attended the stoning, according to Al Aan. ABC News could not independently confirm the cellphone video's authenticity.
The video, which seems to show a woman tethered to the ground as a group of men throw stones at her, is so graphic that ABC News cannot show it in its entirety. Parts of it air today on the 25th episode of "Brian Ross Investigates."
"It's difficult to know where and when it was shot," says Gayle Lemmon, deputy director of the Women and Foreign Policy Program at the Council of Foreign Relations, in an interview with Ross, "It is consistent with videos that have been coming from Taliban-controlled areas since the '90s."
Lemmon says that when women "stray outside the line" in Taliban-controlled areas, they may "face severe punishment."
"Women are respected as carriers of the family honor," says Lemmon, "but they also pay the price."...
Gee, what a great system: be "honored" or be killed!
The ABC link has its own video, including a mostly dismal interview with Lemmon, who hedges on whether this has anything to do with Islam.
But we know better.
Posted by Marisol on September 24, 2010 4:03 PM
Quote:And what was this woman's crime? Here is the back story. "Rare Video Shows Taliban Allegedly Stoning Woman to Death in Pakistan," by Megan Chuchmach for ABC News, September 24
Bad Muslims?
The video must be authentic...it has to be...
Israelis doing bad things to unarmed civilians or disarmed enemies?
First of all, enemies are bad muslims...
Second, won't you believe an Arab source? Hell, they are all antisemites who even managed to take over the U.N...
The gore in the video? Ah, you are really naive for believing whatever you're shown on TV...it's just SFX bullsh!t published by corrupt press bought with oil money by bad muslims, ok?
I do love impartial news...
