Of course, not by him and or his cabal of fellow deviants and socialist retards. Oh no, it's those nasty "mill operators" who have been doing it.
What about situations where the integrity of the poster (or lack thereof) is central to the argument the poster is making, and, therefore, a focus on the poster's integrity becomes at least somewhat relevant to the discussion? Would that fall under ad hominem, and in terms of argumentation, is raising such issues appropriate?
http://forums.degreeinfo.com/showpost.ph...stcount=13
As we have seen since its inception, at Debris Inflow there is one set of rules for the Klempner Klone Kadre and an entirely different one for anyone who dares to disagree with them. Non-believers of their simple-minded "RA or No Way" dogma are attacked, insulted, abused, threatened and stalked, and if they stand up for themselves they are banned for bogus TOS violations. It has always been a rigged game and Thomas "Chip" White, the gay boy porn peddler and pedophile-pandering pervert, is the ring master.
The sodomite coffee-enema quack doesn't seem to understand that he is the problem, not the solution. As long as decent people are going to be attacked by a gang of reprobates just for speaking out in favor of free choice in education and against the wealthy higher ed cartel, he is going to continue to be the problem.
The fact is that Thomas "Chip" White has no credibility whatsoever in distance learning or higher education, and so he wants everybody who notices that fact to shut up. He wishes people would ignore the prurient details of his own sordid existence. Do people really want a little cockroach who makes his living selling gay boy videos to perverts telling them what they can or can't do in any facet of their lives, let alone something as important as their education? Keep shining the light on him and watch him scurry back to his toelicker cesspool.